Why Vista wont suck - According to.....

Man of Honour
Joined
31 Jan 2004
Posts
16,335
Location
Plymouth
LOL at using a USB memory disk "for speed".

I call BS, but good for a laugh :D

Edit: Actually, it's almost certainly real since ET and ZD are reputable, but still, some parts are kinda silly.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2002
Posts
18,022
Location
London & Singapore
I can't believe people actually believe this is fake?

This stuff is real people.

USB sticks are faster than hard drives and Vista supports a special caching facility called SuperFetch.

God knows what happened with the "FX-25", but the OS is still Beta.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
26,052
Let's see who the first tard with their hyper-overclocked CPU which cost 2 grand to cool and decides to make a USB stick array is.
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Jun 2004
Posts
3,534
The vast majority of it doesn't look remotely fake. Anyone actually know for sure rather than just some odd hunch about the speed of USB drivers and so on? The "FX-25" thing is equally likely to be a Micrsoft typo as a bad photoshop. Probably more likely.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2002
Posts
18,022
Location
London & Singapore
Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2002
Posts
18,022
Location
London & Singapore
More weight is given to graphics card type, its size of memory and the system memory. Because the more memory and graphics memory you have, the more textures (i.e. open programs) can be stored without paging them to disk.

The processor has relatively little weight because it will make little difference to the overall performance of Windows.
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Jun 2004
Posts
3,534
So it sounds like we have a bit of excess Vista-bashing here!

Being written as an "FX-25" could actually mean anything, really, though, it might just be a low end Athlon 64 being detected oddly.
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Dec 2004
Posts
11,353
Location
Knowle, Solihull, UK
NathanE said:
More weight is given to graphics card type, its size of memory and the system memory. Because the more memory and graphics memory you have, the more textures (i.e. open programs) can be stored without paging them to disk.

The processor has relatively little weight because it will make little difference to the overall performance of Windows.

Yeah - that's a good point

I remember when I started work and their PCs had 2.8GHz P4s but only 128MB of ram - they ran like an absolute dog!

Upgraded them to 384MB each and it made a huge difference!
 
Associate
Joined
17 Feb 2003
Posts
785
Would be nice if the auto defrag was smart enough only to defrag when needed. Not like u cant do that with sheduling in xp anyway. Do like the idea of a fancy 3d desktop tho.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2002
Posts
18,022
Location
London & Singapore
It's not just about hardware. It takes into account things like how many auto-startup programs you've got. If you look at the top of the screenshot you'll see it can display a list of programs and drivers that are causing Windows to startup slowly.

I think the hardware side of it is kind of pointless... but other than that, an average joe may see that their performance rating has gradually reduced over time which will prompt them to uninstall old junk, tidy up their auto-start programs and generally teach them to be more concious about how their system is performing and ways to keep it performing well.
 
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Joined
31 Jan 2004
Posts
16,335
Location
Plymouth
NathanE said:
It's not just about hardware. It takes into account things like how many auto-startup programs you've got. If you look at the top of the screenshot you'll see it can display a list of programs and drivers that are causing Windows to startup slowly.

I think the hardware side of it is kind of pointless... but other than that, an average joe they may see that their performance rating has gradually reduced over time which will prompt them to uninstall old junk, tidy up their auto-start programs and generally teach them to be more concious about how their system is performing and ways to keep it performing well.
That part could be nifty...hopefully it'll work well.

I'm gonna take a break from being sceptical and say one thing I do like is the appearance of WMP in those shots. Now excuse me while I go and lie down :D
 
Man of Honour
Joined
31 Jan 2004
Posts
16,335
Location
Plymouth
Overall, Vista does look pretty neat and has lots of new features, though nothing Earth-shattering for advanced home users who have no need for "media management", "let's make it really easy to change stuff", and so on. At least, that's what I've seen so far.

Business side of things I couldn't comment on.

The appearance...looks nice. It's growing on me :)

Methinks Vista-bashing is common because:

> It's late
> It's MS
> None of the bashers have used it
 
Back
Top Bottom