Soldato
Glad you're ok mate. Shame about the car though. I always loved the colour of that Rover, agw_01 had it looking amazing.
geiger said:The clio will weigh less
I'd imagine more like 35mph is possible - they could certainly achieve that in 1st.geiger said:I reckon at least 20 is possible, probably whatever the equalivant in first is.
Almost any average car gets unstable when reversed at speed
Matt82 said:it fell off at 50. face it, the rover is dirt
Matt82 said:but the roof should not have caved in like that. im gonna find some pics of my brothers Renault "built in France from tin foil, empty cig boxes and fruit" CLio, that he rolled 3 times
Simon said:Depends on what he rolled on doesn't it.
Personally i would like a car that deforms rather than staying rock solid and not changing shape.
Oh sorry, I forgot this was another opportunity to slate Rovers, You can carry on to make yourselves feel better.
It wouldn't be the that much different. The car wasn't dropped on it's roof, but simply rolled. More speed in a horizontal direction surely wouldn't make a huge amount of differenceMatt82 said:the roof deformed to that degree when the car rolled into its roof, at no more than ~30mph. can you imagine what it would look like if it would have to absorb the impact of a 50mph collision.
Matt82 said:again, face it, they are pathetically built cars. did you ever see the NCAP photos of the Metro? they bring tears to your eyes
M0T said:No worse than most other 90's cars.
The Clio from the same year got barely any better than the metro.
M0T said:No worse than most other 90's cars.
The Clio from the same year got barely any better than the metro.