dynamic or static content ?

Associate
Joined
8 Oct 2005
Posts
97
Location
Bristol
sitting wondering here what to do with one of my sites, its rapidly becoming a nightmare mostly from the admin area side of things

if i want to add a product i get to choose from around 700 different sizes :eek:
each related size will then have 2 prices/1 image/heavy item charge/weight and a picking list for the grunts in the warehouse, not to mention the 2 different related items lists/parent category/sub category and external links

so i was thinking... i could ditch pretty much all of that and just use static pages built from templates on the back end that way i would never have to worry about insane sql statements/ado errors from googles cache and so on

now i cant see a down side to this, has anyone here built site this way? any potential down falls to this?? or should i continue to give the mysql server a good spanking everytime i need to add a product
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
5,464
Location
London Town
Static, definitely. Or, more accurately, dynamically cached static content.

I'm not sure what language you're using, but since you mention MySQL I highly recommend the Smarty templating engine for PHP. The golden function it offers is is_cached() - meaning you only ever need to generate a page's output via the database the first time, and then run off the cached output until the time you wish it to expire and be regenerated. I build nearly every site I work on using it and have seen drastic reduction in load and number of connections when it's used properly.

It also offers granular control of your cache - so you can recompile single, specific templates and cache files when you add a new product to ensure it appears on all the relevant pages.

Of course you could write your own templating engine, or use a different one, but Smarty's one of the best.
 
Back
Top Bottom