EA to buy Mythic

Soldato
Joined
20 Oct 2002
Posts
5,553
http://www.info.ea.com/news/pr/pr786.pdf

Cant say im to happy with this, Mythic made a great mmorpg in Daoc and now are working on Warhammer Online now with EA on board who knows how its going to go. Could be a mixed bag with EA's financial backing but when they start interfering thats when they ruin the games.

Looks like EA are trying to get another bite to the mmorpg market, which will probably get oversaturated in the future.
 

GAC

GAC

Soldato
Joined
11 Dec 2004
Posts
4,688
ah well another ea mmo project so 6 months after it ships when its not hauling 100k subs it will get canned. great :mad:
 
Soldato
Joined
15 Nov 2004
Posts
5,997
Location
Telford
speeduk said:
Few years time and E.A will own all the smaller companies. Is there not anything that can be done to stop them? I actually like innovation in my games. :(

I wish we could, they are monopolising the gaming scene, churning out the same rubbish year after year, EA are the Hollywood of gaming & i hate it !.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
29,491
Location
Back in East London
So.. how long before we get to see 'vehicles' like Dragons for aircraft, Warhogs as tanks etc. in DAoC and gang's restructured to have a commander, map overview with orders, mystical barrages of lighting or some such to replicate artillery and all the other crap etc. etc.?
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Jul 2003
Posts
14,487
unfortunately if they did you'd probably lose your account as your a GOA customer, not a mythic one :p

EA suck they took over Ultima Online and messed it up royally from then on.
 

kdd

kdd

Soldato
Joined
29 Oct 2005
Posts
3,810
Location
Kent
EA don't neccesarily mean bad things when they buy a developer, look at DICE, they made bf2 whilst under ea's control. Being bought by a developer that gave them complete financial freedom meant they could produce a superb game. Seriously this ea bashing is getting a bit childish now, i wiosh people would put their comments in the form of an arguement with some real points and evidence.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Sep 2003
Posts
4,326
Location
Not darn sarf
Depends if EA put profits before innovation and what the develpoer wants to achieve.

I get the feeling they look at Warcraft, see the insane revenue it pulls in, and want a slice of it. Without realising what a massive job it is.
 

kdd

kdd

Soldato
Joined
29 Oct 2005
Posts
3,810
Location
Kent
Well ea have experience of a multiplayer game on an epic scale with bf2, and as i mentioned ea are hardly short of resources of any kind.
 
Caporegime
Joined
22 Jun 2004
Posts
26,684
Location
Deep England
Sleepery said:
Still, maybe now that Mythic are no more, the agreement between them and GOA is void and they could finally take DAOC away from that shower of French muppets.

When one company takes over another, they inherit all the assets and liabilities of that company, so the contract between Mythic and GOA will still apply.

Things will likely stay as they are short term, but who knows what EA's long term plan is.
 

XPE

XPE

Soldato
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Posts
5,530
kdd said:
EA don't neccesarily mean bad things when they buy a developer, look at DICE, they made bf2 whilst under ea's control. Being bought by a developer that gave them complete financial freedom meant they could produce a superb game. Seriously this ea bashing is getting a bit childish now, i wiosh people would put their comments in the form of an arguement with some real points and evidence.


EA didnt fully take over untill they had released BF2 (or round about that time), they only owned 49% of the shares up till that point.
 

kdd

kdd

Soldato
Joined
29 Oct 2005
Posts
3,810
Location
Kent
XPE said:
EA didnt fully take over untill they had released BF2 (or round about that time), they only owned 49% of the shares up till that point.

Ah right, and the fact that ea employed rather than fully owned dice made what difference?
 
Soldato
Joined
29 May 2006
Posts
5,349
“Ah right, and the fact that ea employed rather than fully owned dice made what difference?”
Yes it does unless they are fully owned they cannot interfere with the development as much. If they fully own you EA have more power on what happens. Its not uncommon for EA to pull stunts off like once they fully own you they demand everyone moves half away across the county or lose there job. More then 1 game has been killed by this and the loss of the main developers.

EA don’t exactly have a good track record with MMORPG’s. They tend to buy company’s then kill the MMORPG with bad management. There are plenty of examples of MMORPG going to pot once EA took over. I cannot think of any that where better of with EA.
 

XPE

XPE

Soldato
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Posts
5,530
kdd said:
Ah right, and the fact that ea employed rather than fully owned dice made what difference?


They ONLY distributed the game for DICE before they bought them over, (this is also why you seen EA's name all over BF1942 even tho they had no say in how it was made)



This is like what EA are doing with Crysis right now for crytek, they dont own or tell Crytek how to make games their games or give target to them when they expect the game to be shiped.


Thats the bloody difference.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
9 Nov 2003
Posts
17,699
Location
Leeds
When EA games have a say, they make very good games, no doubt.

The fact that those games are released early, highly buggy, no future support makes EA dire, BF2 buggy as hell after every patch it gets worse, BFME2 not running for loads of people (me!) etc.

Not a good track record, good games but hardly ever work on the reliability front.
 

kdd

kdd

Soldato
Joined
29 Oct 2005
Posts
3,810
Location
Kent
XPE said:
They ONLY distributed the game for DICE before they bought them over, (this is also why you seen EA's name all over BF1942 even tho they had no say in how it was made)



This is like what EA are doing with Crysis right now for crytek, they dont own or tell Crytek how to make games their games or give target to them when they expect the game to be shiped.


Thats the bloody difference.

Yes but no evidence to support. On what occasions?
 
Back
Top Bottom