Soldato
sorry they claimed that the irrecoverable legal costs and management time it would cost them to take it to court arn't worth it so are paying me back.
Captain Planet said:The fact that so many people seem to be getting their money back suggests that the banks dont really rely on these chrages and are happy to cooperate with reimbursing people
Tried&Tested said:Can someone explain which order you're meant to use those templates in? Little confusing.
Beansprout said:I believe ze TV said "the banks should not charge more than is necessary to cover their costs" in other words they shouldn't make a profit from the charges.
Which is why, I believe, they recently pretty much got told to lower their charges and they did, from ~£20 to ~£12.
(This was only one charge though iirc - late payment/overdraft or something - can't rememebr exactly)
Result? Higher credit card APRs! Whoooooooo!
Roalith said:I don't dispute Banks should be making money - it is after all what they do. But to make money off the backs of the people who can least afford it (IE: The ones getting returned d/ds, accidentally going over their overdraft limit etc), is IMHO immoral.
Samtheman1k said:Simple answer: manage your money properly and don't go overdrawn. Maintain an overdraft facility though, so if that DD or whatever does come out a day early, it will just use your authorised overdraft. Don't keep your bank account at the limit of the OD & make sure you have a buffer (even if the OD is the buffer).
shadowscotland said:Been reading this thread with great interest, some good points being made on both sides would just like to say that JimmyEatWorms (page 3) raised a point that so far no-one seams to have noticed.
If you want to vote with your feet, bank ethically with the co-operative bank or smile (its internet award wining version)
Not the very best rates (about .5% below) around but competitive and upfront about its banking polices.
Not only has it got reasonable charges (and in many cases no charges) but also your money is not invested in unethically 'business' like war
http://www.co-operativebank.co.uk/s...gename=Smile/NCView&cpid=1148453764077&c=Page
Service wise it's as good if not better than all high street and most Internet banks.
So ask yourself a question if you buy free-range eggs or low sulphur petrol, a AAA rated electrical appliance, or a low power AMD processor and don’t own a gun, why is my money being invested in the opposite?
stoofa said:*snip*
stoofa said:Which is actually the argument by a lot of people in this thread.
It isn't difficult to monitor your finances and if anything untoward happens like a cheque clearing early or somebody taking a DD early etc a quick call to the bank and they do not send you a letter.
If you are having problems with your finances - going overdrawn then once more a quick visit to your bank and they will sort everything out for you.
If you need somebody to hold your hand when it comes to budgetting and finances then you need to step back and see what is going on and where it is going wrong.
So we are being told that £25 is too much for a bank to charge and it should only be £12 and all these incompetents should be encouraged to claim back what is "rightfully their money".
I don't know about you, but after getting my first £25 letter for going overdrawn or for a cheque not being honoured I wouldn't do it again.
At most I'd be able to claim back around £25 - the difference between the £12 and the £25 I was actually charged.
These people claiming back thousands - it means the banks are constantly, probably monthly sending out letters to these people who are probably justg ignoring them and burying their heads in the sand.
You just wonder how many times a bank has to write to some people before they can get it into their heads that they need to speak with their bank manager and sort something out rather than moaning about the charge for letters get yourself in a position where you don't get sent any!
singist said:So ....... if a speed trap was put on a road unlawfully, and you kept getting charged/fined
singist said:So ....... if a speed trap was put on a road unlawfully, and you kept getting charged/fined, even though you knew it was wrong, you'd be happy to pay and not claim your money back ? (odd example but ya know what I mean) ...... or would you say "People should manage their speed better"?
"they need to speak with their bank manager and sort something out " ...
singist said:So ....... if a speed trap was put on a road unlawfully, and you kept getting charged/fined, even though you knew it was wrong, you'd be happy to pay and not claim your money back ? (odd example but ya know what I mean) ...... or would you say "People should manage their speed better"?
"they need to speak with their bank manager and sort something out " ...
When was the last time you actually spoke with your/any bank manager? I can't, I have to be passed around to the "lending dept" or "collections" or any other dept when I have a query ....
Kitchster_uk said:Most UK arms of the banks make very little once the tax bill has gone.
HSBC has revealed a 37% rise in pre-tax profit to £9.6bn ($17.6bn) for 2004.
Chairman Sir John Bond said 2004 was "another good year for HSBC", which generates nearly a quarter of its earnings in the UK.