How fast is your Photoshop ?

Sparky191 · 13 Nov 2006 at 22:40

nomore said:
LMAO @ Windows users.

Excuses: "badly needs formatting" etc. lol

Why drag a thread of topic anyway? :rolleyes:

number41 · 13 Nov 2006 at 22:41

ElDude said:
...You know, it was only a matter of time until someone found a way to bring nerdy bragging into a photography forum...

Meh.

Lol! Wonder why this thread hasnt been moved to the PC hardware forum? Seems like it's just turned into a bragging match now with 2 or 3 seconds seeming like a huge e-penis for some!

I just enjoy the photography forum for non-geek talk! I can delv into the gaming and hardware parts when I feel like it and escape back here when my head is done in lol

nomore · 13 Nov 2006 at 22:43

Sparky191 said:
Why drag a thread of topic anyway?

It's already off topic with probably 8/10 posts not mentioning what version of Photoshop is being used.

Puffingbilly · 14 Nov 2006 at 14:40

53 Sec

Intel P4 2.8
1024 Memory

Win XP

Sparky191 · 14 Nov 2006 at 16:54

nomore said:
It's already off topic with probably 8/10 posts not mentioning what version of Photoshop is being used.

Theres off topic and theres widely off topic and then there hiding under a bridge with a club and collecting money.

nomore · 14 Nov 2006 at 18:14

Since the OS does effect performance of applications including Photoshop, it is reasonable to include the OS in this thread.

SDK^ · 14 Nov 2006 at 18:33

nomore said:
It's already off topic with probably 8/10 posts not mentioning what version of Photoshop is being used.

That's probably because 80% of the people responding don't take photos, let alone use Photoshop

[Death] · 14 Nov 2006 at 21:04

30secs

Opty 165 @ 2.7
2gb ram
74 gb raptor

Photoshop cs2

glitch · 14 Nov 2006 at 21:43

37 seconds.

Opteron 165 @ 1.8Ghz
2GB PC4000 RAM
Hitachi Deskstar
Photoshop CS2
XP Pro

Sparky191 · 14 Nov 2006 at 22:49

nomore said:
Since the OS does effect performance of applications including Photoshop, it is reasonable to include the OS in this thread.

If its done reasonably.

eveyuk · 17 Nov 2006 at 06:09

3 days 4 hours 21 mins and 2 seconds

Vic 20.

DRZ · 17 Nov 2006 at 18:05

1:47 here - CS2 on a 2.4GHz P4c800 with 1.5Gb of ram.

Darryn · 15 Dec 2006 at 10:24

13.3seconds... Macpro 4x2.66 / 4gb RAM / OSX10.4.8 / PSCS3 beta.

A 3 seconds improvement coming from CS2 to CS3, which is good. (approx 20% improvement) this will be mainly down to the universal binary as it isnt having to run under a Rosetta layer.

Fireskull · 15 Dec 2006 at 10:58

16.86 Using Elements 4.0 on a Mac Pro: 2x2.66 Duel Core Xeons, 5GB ram, i started timer when i clicked ok, not from when the loading bar came up that right?

tsinc80697 · 15 Dec 2006 at 21:20

CS3 slower than CS2 on my G4 2x1.25 with 1.25gb ram

and it is about 50% slower than my P4 805D @ 3.7ghz with 1gb ram

Johnny|lucidcomposure · 15 Dec 2006 at 21:27

CS2 is a finished product. CS3 has a good 3/4 months more production I think

celliott · 15 Dec 2006 at 21:31

52.44sec

Athlon 64 4000+ @ 3GHz
2GB PC3200 RAM

With MSN, Xfire, IE open.

P_A_N_I_C · 16 Dec 2006 at 00:04

~28 secs

CS2
XP Pro
6600
2gb ram

while converting a film in win avi and burning a dvd

haha love the dual core :cool:

Firestar_3x · 16 Dec 2006 at 00:34

Ok just for the hell of it :

CS2
2x Dual Core Xeon 5160, 4MB Cache, 3.0GHz.
8GB Ram
5x 73Gb 15k Scsi Drives in Raid 5
ATI PCI Express Card (Can't Remember Which)

25 Seconds.

Darryn · 16 Dec 2006 at 00:44

What OS are you running there Firestar_3x? id expect with that kind of CPU power you should have spanked my 2x Dual Core Xeon 2.66 4mb cache w/4gb Ram