Our attitudes toward paedophiles.

Associate
Joined
29 Oct 2002
Posts
806
Are you serious? Please dont bring me down to your disgustingly low levels. The very idea is sickening and anyone my age who finds under 16s attractive is clearly a sexual deviant and unable to connect with those 18+.
 
Permabanned
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
47,396
Location
Essex
Lithium said:
Are you serious? Please dont bring me down to your disgustingly low levels. The very idea is sickening and anyone my age who finds under 16s attractive is clearly a sexual deviant and unable to connect with those 18+.
Haha :D Yes I am perfectly serious and I don't think what I am saying is contentious. I expect most men find some under 16s attractive. I can connect just fine with over 18s too ;)
 
Soldato
Joined
28 Oct 2002
Posts
5,014
dirtydog said:
Haha :D Yes I am perfectly serious and I don't think what I am saying is contentious. I expect most men find some under 16s attractive. I can connect just fine with over 18s too ;)
Clearly you lack his unique ability to determine the exact age of someone (because if they're 15.99 years old you're a sicko) just by looking at them. ;)
 
Permabanned
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
47,396
Location
Essex
Lithium said:
Seriously this country is going to hell, im going to stop reading this thread now because its actually quite repulsive.

Am I a sexual deviant to find this attractive?

KeiraKnightley_TheHole_Frankie.jpg

(Keira Knightley, aged 15)
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
20 Oct 2005
Posts
1,231
Location
London
Why do countries have different ages of consent?

So if its ok in Spain at 14, why is it not ok in England.....? Why the difference?

There should be legislation that applies to everyone (worldwide) and this is an area that could benefit in some clarification.

In this country at the age of 10 you can be arrested - why?

I believe some common sense should be applied to law in the UK and the individuals case be dealt with in that manner - nothing is black and white in law. Legislation is specific, courts are not.
 
Permabanned
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
47,396
Location
Essex
gjc10212 said:
There should be legislation that applies to everyone (worldwide) and this is an area that could benefit in some clarification.
You'd never get the whole world to agree though. Even in the US, different states have different age restrictions for example.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Jul 2003
Posts
14,492
Yes perhaps the solution is to lock them up, some people would argue it's not a solution but I'd say it was one option and one I support.

Or if you want to lessen the financial burden that scum like this put on the taxpayer kill them.

Hell fit them with ovaries, punch them in them THEN kill them with fire for all I care, they're sick twisted people and don't deserve to breathe the same air as me.
 
Caporegime
Joined
25 Jul 2005
Posts
28,851
Location
Canada
dirtydog said:
Am I a sexual deviant to find this attractive?

KeiraKnightley_TheHole_Frankie.jpg

(Keira Knightley, aged 15)

And anyone watching The Hole is watching child porn and is a 'pedophile'. There are some strange quirks in ths country.

If Lithium can hnestly say that he can tell an under 16 year old dressued up as an 18 year old then he needs to become a bouncer or security guard as 99% of the population cant.

What is also interesting (dont know whether this has come up already) but there was a major study about 3 years ago broadcast on the BBC that showed if an adult male was asked to describe their ideal female most would end up describing someone of about 14. They didnt realise they were doing it, its just something engrained into the human brain. The reason behind it is that the younger you are the more fertile you are precieved. That means a girl who has just started puberty and has all the atributes attributed to being a woman (child bearing hips, breasts and menstration) is the mate you want.

In that respect supposed 'pedophilia' of people over the age of about 13-14 is perfectly normal, probably less weird than homosexuality. The reason its seen as a bad thing is because our society has a warped sense of 'childhood' and believe that children are people under the age of 18 and need protecting from everything, including using their bodies for what they are designed for.

There is a major difference between being attracted to pubescent 'children' and pre-pubescent children though. People attracted to 10 year olds are rather strange and the previous logic doesn't work here. They are not sexual beings (I don't mean in the sense of an object or plaything), there are no breasts, hips or anything else attributed to being able to bear a child and should not be treated as something they are not.
 
Permabanned
Joined
7 Nov 2004
Posts
2,828
Location
Up a tree - where else?
Nicely put Amp34.

Lithium, you need to think a little more about what you are saying IMHO. If a lass has a womanly figure then most men will find her attractive, be she 14 or 18. When you notice a woman, you notice what she looks like and how attractive she is/isn't - both physically and sexually. An attractive woman is an atractive woman is an attractive woman - end of.

I find that you can admire a painting or a car or a bike without wanting to steal it. In the same way I can admire a good looking lass without necessarily wanting to bed her. And without acting on either of those wants.

Methinks the lady doth protest too much ...
 
Back
Top Bottom