'Scrounging' family gets £500,000 house from council

Associate
Joined
13 Jun 2005
Posts
1,586
When asked why they don't work, the couple say that looking after their children is a full time job. And they claim they would earn less working than they do claiming the dole.
Should have thought of that before spawning the little buggers, shouldn't you.

And if you earn more on the dole than by working, surely the whole system needs looking at.

Although, I thought you lost benefits if you weren't looking for work?


His wife added: "I was born to have children, it's what I am here for."
ARGH. Words fail me.
 

POB

POB

Soldato
Joined
27 May 2003
Posts
5,948
Location
Its a Small World
They really won the house in the recent Sun competion to give your kids the worse names possible:

The couple then had seven of their own: twins Parris-Jordan and Kesla Blu, eight; twins Mason and Peaches, six; Logan, four, and the three-year-old twins Skye and Kalifornya.

:D
 
Associate
Joined
12 Feb 2004
Posts
2,326
Location
Chesterfield
No, I don't see why the tax payer should pay for them to live in a mansion. I also can't see any reason at all why anyone can have 12 kids with no intention of trying to pay for their decision. I think it's wrong that people can be worse off working full time than living on benefits.
 
Soldato
Joined
22 Oct 2004
Posts
9,086
Location
Berkland
I bet he knocked her up when he was door to dooring! :rolleyes:

Says it all though thaty he said he quit his shelf stacking job before he started when he found out he was gonna be down a £100 :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom