LCD for £1,000

Soldato
Joined
5 Jul 2005
Posts
17,995
Location
Brighton
I was in a shop he other day looking at some LCDs, mainly the cheaper 1080p models and the Philips 37pfl7662d stood out in particular. It can be had for just over £760.
 
Associate
Joined
8 Jul 2006
Posts
1,509
Raikiri said:
I was in a shop he other day looking at some LCDs, mainly the cheaper 1080p models and the Philips 37pfl7662d stood out in particular. It can be had for just over £760.

In the same boat, but after weeks of looking I came to the conclusion that there are slim to non 1080p sets that are bug free, which has made me go for a non 1080p set. Havent heard much about the Phillips you have mentioned, but will check it out.
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Jan 2006
Posts
2,547
slightly below your budget but i am split between

Sharp LC42XD1E 42in LCD TV - £897.50 - 9/10 CNE*
and
Toshiba Regza 42X3030D 42in LCD TV £831.75 - 9/10 CNE*

no one on this forum seems to have one (http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=17761114) but i chose the Toshiba based on
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/selector.php

I didnt want a sony because of the lottery you play with the clouding issues, and the samsungs were over my £900 budget

This all assuming you are planning on playing games and watching movies, not watching sd tv on it

Edit: still not decided will update this thread when i choose one :)
 
Last edited:
Suspended
Joined
17 Mar 2006
Posts
9,055
M86 and M87 are the same screen, pretty sure M87 isn't 100hz (which is pointless for LCD IMO) PAL is 50hz, NTSC is 60hz. Which M86 displays at native resolution. If it has to upsample 50/60hz to 100hz it means more processing. 100hz processing was always awful on CRT's

M86 screen is glossy, M87 is matt.
happy with my 40" M86, some very minor clouding but only noticeable on a black screen. 1080p from HTPC and oppo works fine. No nead pixels, no buzzing, or banding.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Nov 2002
Posts
4,279
Location
Brum, Brum, Brum, Brum....
m86 and m87 are the same, m86 only available via Currys/dixons group.

the 100hz is more to allow the picker to flicker quicker, which reduces motion blur in fast scenes, e.g. football.

if this is a problem samsung are releasing a new range that will by 100hz soon, 40" for around 1300.

hdtvtest.co.uk has a good review of the LE40M87...
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Jan 2006
Posts
2,547
i really cant decide between these models :confused:

My requirements:
-intended for use with a wii and a PS3, also a PC for movie and a couple of games but this isnt high priority. The ps3 and wii arent plugged in at the same time for the majority of the time, and i have a S-Video to SCART atm for pc to tv so worst case i could do without a VGA port.
-1080p, please keep the 720 vs 1080 to a minimum please i seen the 2 in action in show rooms and to me at least the difference is very clear
-42" is the size i am aiming for, but 40" is fine i dont really want to go any lower than that.
-Be able to play SD at a reasonable rate, this is not a priority at all but i would like the tv to be ok to view
-Approximately £900-ish budget

Now i have narrowed it down to:

Toshiba Regza 42X3030D 42in LCD TV - £840 + free delivery
Trusted Reviews - 9/10
HDTVOrg - 88%
HDTVTest
I was really interested in this tv and it seemed to have glowing reviews, but when searching user pov's and this forum i found it seems to have problems running blu-ray

SUMMARY
The 42X3030D is Toshiba's latest effort in the 1080 LCD arena, holding it's own where colour and low-light detail is concerned.

VGA: 1360x768 WXGA
HDMI: 50/60 Hz (includes 24FPS, altho there is conflicting info from users)

PROS
> True 1080p panel, accepts and displays 1080p source.
> Excellent colour after calibration
> Attractive, gloss frame design

CONS
> Greyscale behaviour inconsistent
> No greyscale or gamma controls
> Mild digital noise

Sharp LC42XD1E 42in LCD TV - £868.10+16.50 del
trustedreviews - 9/10
hdtvorg - 92%
hdtvtest

SUMMARY
As the cheapest 46-inch 1080p LCD TV available on the market today, Sharp LC46XD1E offers excellent value-for-money despite some flaws.

PROS
> Fantastic black level + high calibrated contrast ratio
> Pin-sharp high resolution detail
> Unbeatable price point: £1350 for a 46-inch 1080p LCD TV

CONS
> Screen uniformity issues ('banding')
> Electronic buzz (even in standby) and low-pitched hum
> Red push

Sony KDL40W2000 40in LCD TV - £979.00+Free delivery
1staudiovisual
CNET - 9.3
hdtvorg - 5 stars
Hdtvtest

This ones more expensive but is the extra cost worth it?, also is there a difference between the above and the Sony KDL40W2000U ?

SUMMARY
This model is our current 1080p LCD TV class leader for picture quality and tweakability, this side of 1500 pounds.

HDMI: 1080p
Component: 1080i
VGA: 1360x768

PROS
> Excellent image with good contrast and respectable blacks
> Wide range of picture adjustments
> Independent memory inputs

CONS
> Inaccurate colour and slight motion blurring
> Average styling considering the price
> Some connectivity issues
> 1080p only though HDMI (not component or VGA)

Note: Clouding may be specific to our review model.


SAMSUNG LE40M86BD 40 in LCT TV - £879.10+£16.90 del
I rad on a couple of forums there were issues with this model too on bluray
hdtvtest
SUMMARY
Samsung LE40M86BD is a massive improvement over its predecessor, and one of the best LCD TVs in its class.

1080p over VGA, Component and HDMI

PROS
> Excellent black level + high calibrated contrast ratio
> Super Clear Panel™ adds depth and realism
> Generous connectivity (three HDMI 1.3)

CONS
> Less-defined shadow detail
> Inaccurate colours
> Awkward film mode deinterlacing


Compariosons:
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/1080p-LCD-Shootout/

It would be REALLY helpful if people shared their expriences/added recommendations :), at this point in time i am leaning towards the Sharp/Sony as they seem to have the better picture quality according to reviews
 
Last edited:
Suspended
Joined
17 Mar 2006
Posts
9,055
I've had that Sharp XD1 42", and now own Samsung M86 40"
If the Sharp didn't have the common faults, then would have been happy with that, as it is though it suffered from backlight hum at most backlight settings, some ghosting that only showed up on certain scenes, banding on the second set, and standby buzzing.

Conncecitivity on the Samsung is much better, one extra HDMI port, dedicated component & VGA inputs -Sharp which only supports 720p/1366x768 over component/VGA. VGA definietly supports 1920x1080p, as tested it myself.

The Sony uses a previous gen Samsung panel, the Samsung M86 is newer gen. As for picture there was a couple of months gap between Sharp and Samsung so can't say about PQ.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
12 Jan 2006
Posts
2,547
if you buy the sharp you need to get the Sharp LC42XD1EA which replaced the older model due to various problems, i thought the other was discontinued and unavailable sos

Ultimately i think its down to the Sharp and Samsung now due to the sony having a older screen,
The samsung has full 1080p over vga, component and HDMI
whereas the sharp but you cannot do 1080p over vga or component
However the sharp has a better picture quality

Choices :confused: :confused:
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
3,074
Location
manchester
I thought it was the n87 which had the matt screen, and both the m86 and m87 both have gloss screen.
Just only one (large)retailer sold the m86 and everyone else got the m87
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Feb 2006
Posts
3,950
Location
Lincolnshire
Hi, you are correct sven256, squiffy has it wrong as the M86 and the M87 have identical panels. I've the M87 and I can assure you it is glossy....
ChrisC

EDIT Re-read squiffy's post and now I understand he probably meant the LCD panel surround not the actual LCD panel itself...
ChrisC
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom