I'm assuming you refer to yourself when you make such comments but surely you can't have come off that badly, if you can be driving a 530 around?
I'm happy to accept this is down to things like the fact you aren't ****ing away £40 a week on booze etc. but surely if you were really getting as screwed over as you make out, you'd not be enjoying the kind of luxuries you are now?
edit - i'm not trying to have a dig, just confused as to how if you are honestly getting that screwed by the loans people, how you aren't living in a ditch eating stale bread
The funding issue more or less made the decision of whether I stayed at home for Uni, or went away for Uni, for me. As a result of this decision it's meant I'm a lot more comfortable than I would have been, and of course, I'm more or less happy with the way things went.
But that doesn't change the fact that I really had less of a choice than others simply becuase of the ridiculous way everyone is Means Tested.
An idea on the figures:
To move out for Uni when I started in 2004:
I would have been entitled to a student loan of £3200 a year (75% of max loan amount)
I would have been entitled to zero grants
I had to pay 100% of the fee amount with zero LEA contribution (So, £1125 a year).
This would have meant I would have had a total of about 2 grand to pay for accomodation, living expenses, etc etc.
Lets assume I'd met the criteria for all the governments free money.
I would have been entitled to a student loan of £4000 a year
I may have been entitled to an additional grant, which need not be repaid, of £1000 a year
I would have had to pay zero Uni fees, as the LEA would contribute 100%.
This would have meant I would have had a total of £5k to pay for accomodation, living expenses, etc etc.
Now can you see why I stayed at home? Sure, I got a job at home and would have got a job away from home as well but the difference in the available cash over the year is simply huge.
All becuase of what? Becuase I'm expected to get Mummy to pay for my 4 years of enjoyment?
Why are all perspective students not afforded the SAME level of financial assistance? Why is there this underlying concensous that parents should pay for their ADULT children to go to Uni? I was over 18 when I decided to go.