Also from MediaLens...
Alcohol and tobacco have a bad effect on many more people. Seems strange to crack down hard on cannabis and yet continue to allow widespread use...
Good MediaLens recently about how biased the media is, as always, with regard to Iraq coverage... spending more time discussing the alleged (but...
It's still the case that the vast majority of attacks are targetted against coalition forces.
But my point was that "It has a bad effect on me" is not a valid reason that something should be banned, because everything is bad for somebody.
Some people get addicted to alcohol, gambling, shopping, and many other things. Should we ban all of those too?
The mental, i.e. the brain, IS physical. So yes, it does explain how reading a celebrity magazine can help make somebody anoxeric. It's just...
Speak for yourself ;)
Good idea. Like all aspects of society in fact. The amount you get out should be related to the amount you put in <there is a joke in there...
Religious people perhaps? I listened to "Beyond Belief" last week on radio 4 and they were talking about organ donation and one of the religious...
Not just us, I've never heard anybody (except the BBC) talk about disposable income in that way. But no it makes no sense, since I wouldn't...
So why and when was it specifically enacted? "Permanent residence" is just more than 183 days per year though isn't it - so that person can live...
But the £1 earned is a bit arbitrary (which might be like a bit pregnant - but I know what I mean!). Salaries are set, and requested, taking into...
I think the large number of homeless people in the UK might disagree with you on that. OK they are alive, obviously, but that's not what anybody...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6902463.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6902519.stm Everyone should be seen as a potential organ donor on their death unless they expressly request...
And the non-domicilie loophole that the government keep refusing to close.
That's what I would describe it as yes, but not the BBC it seems, since they imply that people - despite higher disposable income - are worse off...
I presume they mean household income, so usually two earners perhaps.
Just what people generally think of the widening rich/poor divide I guess, especially given that our current government claim to be socialists!...
Separate names with a comma.
