Search results

I thought graves were sold with leases attached (at least in modern times) and once the lease expires, the landowner is free to do with it what they please. If that is the case, it might explain why graves of notable people remain or those buried hundreds of years ago who may have actually owned...

Dissolve me and give my loved ones the bone dust baby!

Perspicacious. E.g. Efour is one of GD's most perspicacious posters on the topic of ferretology.

Hello gorgeous <3

Oh hey guys, look at this Wikipedia article I don't understand so I just paste a link to

Inb4 Oxford is inherently Liberal masturbatory nonsense

I hate to resort to this kind of lame duck posting but ffs Google nationalism and its OED definition. Hopefully as such a patriot you'll accept their definition of the word. Then talk about not understanding English or whatever garbage ass posting you're so desperate to do.

What is your point because the edit makes it seem like you don't know what you're on about and honestly I have no idea either.

What was dumb about my point that nationalism is bad and not the same as patriotism? The argument then became idiotically reductive (which appears to be a common deflection tactic round these parts) and it's my bad for continuing to engage it - I'll fess up to that.

Says the guy dogpiling in an unrelated thread. :) Just FYI, the edit was for phrasing, the snark was in the original post, I just finessed it after the fact to read better. I still don't get why you're so weirdly fixated on it though.

Lmao "I can't read more than a paragraph that disagrees with my incorrect worldview so you're a bad, naughty, mean person!" It was the MSE/Sunday Times jibe wasn't it? Seems like it touched a nerve lol.

Still upset I called you out for posting out yer ass?

Yes. Why else would you give them preferential treatment? :/ It is baffling because you think I'm stupid enough to take your argumentative bait instead of calling it out.

Putting something first is by definition inferring it is superior to other things, that is how prioritisation works. For something to be put first, other things have to be put second or third, i.e. a lesser priority. I'm not really sure how I can communicate that to you any more clearly than I...

If you put one group of people first, how is that not by definition putting other groups of people 'not first'? Putting our people first is by definition deciding that they have some degree of supremacy over other people. I'm not sure why you're going off on some angry tangent about shame about...

I mean it sounds like you have a broader issue with advertising (or maybe Eamonn Holmes? I can get behind that). How is any company going to sell their product or service without telling people it exists and what the potential benefits of it are? At least with a lifetime mortgage it has to clear...

How can you believe in the supremacy of the nation state without accepting that it means that other nation states are lesser in some way? You say that the UK should put its citizens first, in a zero sum game how does that square with no detriment to other nations/citizens?

I'm far from a know it all, but if I see posters nailing their colours to very wonky masts I'm absolutely going to have a bit of fun with it. Don't take it personally. :p No regulation is bullet proof and the current regulations are a direct result of what was (a long time ago) a bit like the...

It isn't at all, this is a very outdated view. I'm asking why somebody who presumably is not a qualified adviser is giving such a strong opinion on something they clearly have an outdated understanding or an outright misunderstanding of. For a lender to provide a lifetime mortgage they will...

What's wrong with lifetime mortgages? :confused: