Search results

I do that and yet still tend to find someone has parked next to me. Normally a juke, note or jazz.

Think I've won this one for today...parked up stationary in a marked bay and a woman drove in to the side of my car. Then tried to drive off. Caught up with her and pulled in front to get her details after chasing her and signalling for her to pull over. Her response - "I didn't think there was...

Dunno like, most videos I see of Chinese kids they're torturing defenceless animals to death.

What type of glue did you use? If superglue it becomes very brittle when cold. Stick it in the freezer and you can quite often fix mistakes.

Did you read his post? He clearly points out its the provider of the cards that's raising the issue and he's just curious on people's thoughts.

But it's not the driver questioning it. Its those responsible for dealing with the costs.

Surely leaving them in peace would mean not giving them benefits and such?

I thought prejudice was bad?

The man shouldn't be at risk from any mob in the first instance. The police being far too soft with them is to blame for that risk.

They are and they aren't. There are a group of people that simply can't behave and can't be trusted and the police are not dealing with them adequately. The police aren't the cause but they're also not part of the solution right now.

Exact same thing. Then they wave their arms and speed up when overtaken.

There's a difference between keeping two separate groups apart and saying an individual can't go somewhere.

Literally everyone had one of those in the 90s!

But they don't do it based upon race.

It might be an act of provocation but that doesn't excuse violence.

You're right, but that's the point really. The police are policing the wrong people. They're pathetic. However we've known this for some time. What's that at the back, Rotherham? Naaaah, they didn't act like cowards there either.

I've no doubt that if you or I used such a term to keep someone out of an area we'd find ourselves in front of a judge.

The original question, that you dismissed was why are there so many Isiscels in Australia. It doesn't matter whether the attack was successful or not for there to have been an islamist. Therefore entirely relevant.

Why only the ones that occurred? Surely those that were prevented are as pertinent? Or does terrorist intent not count as long as there's a suitable police force?

What, like Niyak Ghorbani who was assaulted during one of the recent hamas Palestinian support protests and instead of those who assaulted him being arrested, he was?