Search results

Read it, so, I think I mis-read your post. I thought you were saying you wanted a convex one to create a more uniform puck, whereas it deliberately creates an un-uniform puck.

If the grounds are level there shouldn't be a difference in pressure across the tamper

I eat mostly vegan. Though I will have milk in a latte, and cheese on things on occasion almost all our meals are vegan. I feel I eat meat responsibly and when I do I buy from the best source I can (local farm produce)

Well now, I did notice the discussion got much clearer suddenly, to the point that I got a clear answer and as I posted above, admitted I was wrong about the revoking rights of access being nonsense. If I'm ignored that's a shame, but I didn't report, I've only ever reported spammers on ocuk...

Well, Scots law is always different, especially with regards to the land reform act etc

That doesn't answer my questions(to the law), but it does correct me. With regards to TVL (the point of this thread) withdrawing rights of access is not nonsense. I'm not reading the second one, 160 odd pages!

The quote you took was talking about warrants, so sorry. I have still seen no evidence right of access can be removed. A right of access for a doing a job is allowed, like gas/electricity readings etc. Now, I fully understand these are agreements you've made with a company whereas TVL is a...

Are you claiming that after a warrant is issued their employer would tell them not to enter a property?? Sounds like a waste of court time applying for the warrant.... Very few, though I'm not the one claiming there's any legal standing to a 'withdrawal of right of access' The very phrase just...

If they have a warrant they have the power to enforce it, that's literally what a warrant is, granting you that power by a judge. Now they don't have the power to force entry or touch you etc, so yes it's a pointless bit of paper they use to scare people. I understand many people have been...

It's a common law, so they'd need to find a case where prosecution against someone who had those rights revoked then 'trespassed' and was charged. I doubt it'll be there, or it would be the first thing you'd write on your 'revoking of access' letter no? The thing that would mean you can do that...

......No....?? A shame, as in, it's shameful. What a strange elevation to wanting you dead??? You seem to be along the line of 'if you've broken a law you can't argue with me' Well I've broken many laws, many times. At no point do I think I was right to do so, nor would I object to having...

Continuing with personal attacks then? It is clearly a case of attitude to the law. There are laws, a list of things people as a society agree should carry some kind of dissuading punishment. You don't agree with one, and decide your decision to ignore it is right. It tells about your attitude...

Don't need to, you're attitude to law says it all, you value your interpretation above others. A shame that people like you exist

Big pat on the back for you then? Seen a law you don't agree with and decide that stealing is the best recourse. I could equate it to many other crimes, but you've given your opinion of me and there's no use really

Well by signing up to a service to deliver live TV to your home, it's reasonable to assume you now are

Well a Bailiff has a court order, so yeah they're different. I know TVL peeps like to call themselves 'enforcement officers' but that doesn't change they're a normal citizen going about a job. But it's much like a gas meter person, they're just turning up to check the service. Unfortunately TVL...

It shows I was wrong about their response to it, yes. And I did admit that it might make you more hassle than you are worth to continue pursuing. But you telling someone they have no right on your land does not change the fact they DO have a right on your land for the execution of their job...

Well this is anecdotal, I'm glad it worked for you, and I'm sorry if you were under some kind of harassment. But I'm yet to see any shred of evidence that it has any legal standing. Best I've found was a solicitor's website that said it was tantamount to having a 'no trespassing' sign and...

Wow, here comes the attacks on people for not agreeing with you. You speak as if owning land is something more significant than an agreement between you and the government that you can do certain (and very limited) things on a patch of earth that they still own..... 'owning' land just means you...

Well there it is, the fact that you're saying nonsense with no backup. If you'd like to discuss the civil matter of trespass? then it's basically null as regardless of any piece of paper you've sent them there is no way to guarantee any change of circumstances hasn't occurred yes? Or is that...