Search results

http://www.vanilladays.com/gallery/2008/ I post nearly every day and only around 55 HDR's this year. Clearly you're not watching me close enough. Seriously dude, if you're going to jump into a thread with randomly stupid nonsense about how I've single handedly blown HDR out of all...

Ty. Here for one night only :) Well then, don't start something you can't finish :p

Oh what a completely stupid thing to say. I only ever do HDR when its needed. I have always told people that. Theres not really any way you can better HDR. I mean your average sunny day has a contrast ratio of say 100,000:1 and a HDR file can store a scene with a contrast ratio...

I can say with full confidence that tone mapping is used professional. I'm working with some large companies right now who want my style of HDR.

Is it sharper at 103%?

Wait, but the f/4 is the better lens and it can't do f/2.8? Hmmm annoying. So if you wanted f/2.8 the f/4 wouldn't really be a good choice no matter how slightly sharper it is with your eyes right up against the screen. The f/4 might be sharper than the f/2.8 at f/4 but the f/2.8 is easily...

I was being sarcastic you jelly baby :p I meant that the f/4 lens, you know the one I'd been arguing with you about, was magically creating less dust because it was such an amazing lens :p Now then, about those f/2.8 samples from your f/4 lens :p

Yer but with mrk you just don't know :p

Gotcha. F/4 reduces dust, but apparently increases BS.

That'll be due to f/4 as well I guess.

Having used mine for events the weight is fine, unless you're a girl. I've also done 1 meter prints with it at f/13 or so and they looked great. Guess you had a duff copy or something because mine is very good. Still waiting on your f/2.8 from f/4 shots :p

Its really not a problem at all. Check out my shots up there which appear to be sharper than mrk's :p Its only if you're completely anal about sharpness that it becomes an issue. f/4 might be slightly sharper but it doesn't do f/2.8 which is why I bought it.

Yeah cos we all know that people view pics at 100% :p The point was that my resized images look just as sharp as your resized images at the start. I'll be waiting for your f/2.8 shot from your f/4 too :p

I'd guess that the f/4 is pretty rubbish at f/2.8 though :p I'm just not seeing "scary sharp" there.

I couldn't see it so I boosted in PS and now I can. Thats very cool.

I bloody hope none of my work has been used that way. :mad:

Hey dude, cheers :) Still taking firework photos though ;)

Haha :D

Refreshers went first too. I have some left to sustain me through the chilly days ahead :D

Yeah :D Awesome review in today's Metro too comparing me to Chambre Hardman and that my work was right out of Lord of the Rings. Tonight was fantastic and just what I needed to feel like the next 3 weeks will be a success :D :D