Search results

  1. Tyrim

    UserBenchmark Bias

    Nah, i would certainly benefit from a 10900k compared to a 3900x in my workloads(fea and cad +occasional gaming) it would be faster. Except, if you factor in that where i live it costs $200 more to buy a 10900k, it doesn't worth it anymore. It comes out to around 130 weeks of work to pay for...
  2. Tyrim

    UserBenchmark Bias

    No amount of weighing can explain this: 3900x vs i7-860 3900x faster in single core by 88%, quad core by 128%, and 64 core by 500+% Yet overall score is just +33% Also, by now they removed multi-core performance entirely, and hide 64 core on the bottom of the page...
Back
Top Bottom