Search results

Sorry, I'm just so busy and it's very complicated so difficult to know what to say, or where to start. When I first wrote the op, I was convinced, as per my education, that reality can be explained based on what can be seen and measured i.e., deterministic materialism. It seems reasonable...

**update after 17 years** It was really interesting to read this thread from 17 years ago, sort of like a time capsule :) And even better, I can bump and update what I’ve discovered because there was a lot of hope expressed that in the future (now) there would be greater clarity, and the good...

The toddler dropped the Macbook Pro and now the screen is dead, although the touchbar and computer work when turned on and plugged into the TV, therefore, instead of spending hundreds of pounds repairing it, I'm thinking of spending the money on a monitor instead. The computer is used for work...

So they surveyed the whole Earth in ancient times? How did they travel the whole earth? Some of the glyphs reveal the structure of the sea bed, except there are no hills to stand on and human eyes can’t see through that much water. But sure... no... whatever makes you feel better.

Here’s a brief video on the theory https://youtu.be/NL-kKuNlLtU

https://nazcasolution.com/ This group has come up with a theory that the Nazca Lines are a 2d map of Earth and now we are able to fit the lines to a 3d sphere e.g., using google earth. And it reveals what the glyphs mean, the bioglyphs, the tapering rectangles. Also it reveals the advanced...

True but it’s harder than you think being intelligent in the face of pure ignorance.

Yeh, so amazing that a doctor cares about health, or that doctors and scientists in the EU care about safety standards. Anyway, this was a failure, people are too close minded in this world, back to more pleasant circles.

The book in the op has 160 pages of references, some from Nobel laureates. So, you’ll have to excuse me if I don’t budge. Who are you, in this debate, why is your opinion valuable? I’ve provided plenty of sources, if you’re unwilling to engage then I can do no more. It takes a couple of days to...

Consider yourself corrected

Sorry, busy day. Sure I believe viruses are contagious, I put on and off the correct protective clothing many times a day to prevent myself contracting coronavirus. I came across this work from the EU 5g appeal, which is a consortium of scientists and doctors who are lobbying the EU to halt 5g...

The book is a synopsis of 200 years of scientific study. I can’t summarise a summary. I would urge everyone to just read it, I’d respect you if you read it and disagreed rather than just decided it must be wrong. Remember, you are in danger of making the same mistake as all those who thought...

All of that sounds reasonable, it represents the majority opinion of society. But this guy has written a compelling essay with an enormous number of references. I still think it is possible to read this and reach your own conclusion but all of your arguments are addressed in this book.

Some people find part one a bit more technical, you could start with part 2 and then go back that might work, but definitely suspend disbelief until you have read it. 1/3 of the book is bibliography, it doesn’t, in general suffer from a lack of sources!

I hope not but definitely possible.

I have read about his court case and I think that was cruel, we can’t blame individuals who just behave normally. However, his idiocincracies, don’t matter, attacking the man doesn’t change the science. I suggest you read the book it’s evidence based. edit: I'm about to go to work so unlikely...

There’s nothing mystical about it, it’s science heavy.

Today I read this brilliant book that I wanted to share with you all. It’s free to download (probably because it’s so important) but I’ve also bought it, twice! In the UK you can pre-order it on Amazon, it’s due for release on 9th April 2020. It’s called The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur...

Look at the date Delonge was on his show, and the guests he's had on it since (Lazar, Fravor), as well as the response to the Nimitz material that was released. Nimitz was significant, it made the whole thing a lot harder to refute which narrowed that area in which reasonable doubt can exist...

That's true, I'm sure we have already made our own. I think the TTSA is about how to inform the public, almost to show that the public can handle the truth because up until now the assumption has been they can't, which probably isn't wrong. Even this thread shows since the OP people may be able...