Search results

:cry:

yes that is true in the historical sense but what they could also do is keep selling the 4090 and give mediocre uplift on the 5080 (like they did with the 2080 series) and price the 5090 to the moon.... unfortunately. Then when they want to wrap up the 4090 they drop a 5080Ti or something like...

ok but try it and you will see yourself I'm not anti Meta btw the day they release a product that meets my needs I'll be on it like a rash, I am anti-Meta influencers thou those guys can "****" right off cos they spread bias and misinformation which sours the VR community imho

come up to Norfolk and find out ;) bring ur Pro

yeah so you are comparing backwards based on your experience, try a Crystal and see what you think maybe take the Quest Pro with you. I'm not saying the Crystal is the perfect headset (it has its compromises too they all do) but you'll soon see the image compromises in the Pro

the lenses are decent, but its just one part of the package you have screen resolution/eye tracking/compression/FoV/inside out tracking/controllers/local dimming/brightness/colour/comfort/price what other headsets have you tried?

its all a compromise, even the high end headsets that have the clarity have to battle against weight, cost and performance

Yeah so GN didn't really make any predictions it was more commentary and thoughts where as NAAF rightly points out a 5090 'like' gaming GPU will be on the same process node and therefore based on historical data can expect up to a 30% improvement unless they radically up the die size possibly...

I don't think we'll get a massive upgrade over the 4090 this time, what is pushing Nvidia to do that and even if they can with these interlinked die's there is no way in hell they are selling that to consumers at an already phat margin. They will want to sell that stuff to the datacentre & AI...

until AI demand falls off a cliff or silicon fab's massively increase their output we are stuck in a hostile market, 2025 could start to change that

I went from the HTC Vive Pro2 (itself an upgrade from Quest2) to Crystal and yes the difference is really noticeable, in Elite what you'll see is the local dimming and the overall clarity being night and day difference. Crystal with DMAS is the one to go for if you want the best audio/visual...

or they detected a single rain drop and water damage isn't covered by the warranty

Took a while but here we go enjoy or flame to ur hearts content :) I think its a pretty fair round up for all https://youtu.be/Rpcv6jgzuVw

there used to be a SteamVR benchmark and an OpenVR one too but you're better off imho running a dev or performance tool whilst in game to see where the bottlenecks are and making comparisons with other IL-2 players

I've got it mounted now, I'll have a play with it this afternoon. I've ordered some smaller extension parts as well to try along with the physical limiters its going to require some experimentation to get right... https://youtu.be/bkfkUs26gmo

and simulations, I defy anyone not to be impressed with DCS, Star Wars Squadrons or MS Flight Sim in a decent setup

For task use yes, the back rest system on the Please is superior particularly if you are prone to moving about in the chair. I'll try and do a video over the weekend as there isn't a lot of info about this comparison, there are strengths and weaknesses to both.

Yeah nearly all 'gaming chairs' are as you say but have you seen the Monstertech MFC Flight Chairs? https://www.monster.tech/en/product-category/chairs/ These are different. I might do a review of one vs. Steelcase Please v2 to show people the differences and what to expect.

I had to RMA a 4090 FE last year due to a fan bearing issue, it had to be shipped back to Hong Kong via FedEx and they sent me a new one took about 3-4weeks.