Irrefutable is a bit absolutist in a world of deepfakes and AI-generated movies isn't it?
I'm willing to believe that enough people witnessed it and that's good enough but not for ending someone's life especially if the only reason this occurred in the first place is societies apathy towards...
I dunno... if it happened very recently (like being live or basically live) the moron angle could be used to escape consequence, but anything that is perceived as 'a long time ago' is going to be treated with suspicion. It certainly fits the bill for revenge porn.
I think the addition of minimum (who reads articles?) is rather important context and the lack thereof is prime 'he'll be out in half the time' material.
It can be objectively worse and still be exaggerated.
The way the news reports on London as if it's a national problem instead of a London one is I think a consequence of local news being demolished.
Inevitable really when the social contract was destroyed and millennials had to suffer being the first generation where life gets worse. However I think most of it is in people's heads that it's more violent now than in the past, I think that's just a symptom of the internet and 24/7 media.
The BBC are also stirring up pro-establishment trouble constantly with their garbage headlines.
He was given a MINIMUM of 13 years and whilst there's a valid argument that it should just be life without appeal (or whatever it's called here) the judge has to follow guidelines for sentencing.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.