Search results

Phone them tomorrow, or as has said post in customer service section. Im certain they will refund you the difference. In my experience the customer service is second to none.

Phone them. Customer service is excellent. I ordered a 7970 OC from them at £420 i think. Next day it was on sale at £399. Gave them a call and they refunded difference!

You said St. Mirren would be better off if Morton replaced Rangers in the SPL. Completely discounting the loss if television revenue and sponsorship. I have already discredited the article you posted by Andrew Smith (former Celtic View editor)inwhich he claims Dundee Utd would cancel out the...

Really? Are you forgetting your ludicrous assertion that the offer to creditors was worth less than a penny in the £, despite having the details of the offer showing that a worst case scenario would result in just under 4p in the £. Were you bang on with that? Were you bang on with your...

To be fair Mark, talking sense is not something you are guilty off with regards this subject!

If you buy a house, fail to pay council tax and fail in the general upkeep of the maintenance, is it somehow the fault of the person you bought the house from? David Murray is to blame for a number of things, not least the financial dereliction of duty on at least 2 occasions throughout his...

Dave King has no say in whether the CVA is accepted, unless he challenges the sale of share to Charles Green and can substantiate his claim that he has first refusal. As far as his shareholding goes, if 85% of the shares are worth £1, how much do you think Dave King's shareholding is worth?

Again, prior to May 2011 the club had met all its obligations and had enough money to run day to day. The potential £75million debt is just that. Potential. If the club was found to owe £75million it would have entered administation at that point anyway. This insolvency event is totally...

Really? I am a Rangers fan, as are a few others on this thread. Which 1 of has said we should not be punished? The mitigating circumstances are pretty self explanatory. But since you insist I will point them out for the hard of learning: Rangers Football Club were in essence, hijacked by a...

Rangers, at the time of the takeover were £18million in debt. Approximately 40% of their annual turnover. There are clubs in the UK with debt well over 100% of their annual turnover. So again, what is your point?

There is no liquidation sale of assets for £115 million. As I said, I will excuse the fact you claim not to be a huge footy fan. But you could at least do some research regarding the inolvency process. Craig Whyte and Rangers Football Group (Liberty Capital PLC) own the floating charge over the...

Even you cannot be that thick or bitter as to not understand the mitigating circumstances. FFS, even the SFA have belatedly acknowledged this with their rule changes regarding change of ownership. Unless you think that is just a coincidence?

Are you for real? Do you even understand the definition of the word 'fair'?

Im sorry, and I will excuse the fact you are not a huge foot fan... But Rangers being in administration is nothing to do with chasing or winning silverware. We are in administration due to events since Craig Whyte's takeover (May 2011). Most notably the non payment of VAT, PAYE and NIC to HMRC...

And yet it has been proven in a court of law not to be fair! You are also forgetting that the independant tribunal did not see expulsion or suspension as "reasonable", hence the statement saying both were "too severe"! So for you to suggest that eithe are reasonble is laughable given that...

If there is a contract. We are assuming a contract between the SFA and the member clubs exists. Even so, i a contract has any relevant clauses for withholding of prize monies for whatever the SFA deem to be thir right, then it would be perfectly legal. I would usually say that since the...

Correct. And I assume the contract will state something along the lines of, "it is the SFA's right to withhold any prize monies in the result of disciplinary issues or in an insolvency event and monies being owed to other member clubs"

If you are a Rangers hater, which we have already established you are. So your opinion of a "reasonable" punishment hardly impartial is it?

Lets be clear, Rangers failure to pay HMRC the PAYE that was deducted from employees wages was totally wrong and in doing so the club deserve to be punished. What people are failing to realise is that the club have been forced to enter administration as a result, which in itself is a punishment...

I failed to spot the 'alleged' anywhere in your post.