1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

    Dismiss Notice

40th Anniversary Intel - Core i7-8086K - 5.0GHz+

Discussion in 'CPUs' started by Journey, 30 May 2018.

  1. humbug

    Caporegime

    Joined: 17 Mar 2012

    Posts: 37,959

    They are all binned in some sort of fashion, this just means they are keeping more of the good ones back for yet more binning, so you have less chance of getting such a good one from the 8700K retail stack.
     
  2. Troezar

    Mobster

    Joined: 6 Aug 2009

    Posts: 4,897

    I was thinking of this isn't a binned 8700K what is it? It has 6 cores and 12 threads on the same process. What else is there physically they could change? Soldered would be one but would fly in the face of their reasoning for using toothpaste. They aren't changing the architecture for this one chip. They may throw in some goodies but that doesn't physically alter the chip from an 8700K.

    Seems an odd one to me. Only sense it magus is if you were contemplating buying an expensive binned 8700K.

    It should really be called an Anniversary 8700K. The rest is marketing guff in my opinion.
     
  3. Hotwired

    Sgarrista

    Joined: 17 Aug 2009

    Posts: 8,652

    Intel has had enough of seeing 3rd parties skimming off profits from selling binned chips so for a premium they're doing their own pre-binned chips.

    A new name to suggest it's a new chip though ;)
     
  4. SiDeards73

    Soldato

    Joined: 19 Feb 2011

    Posts: 5,843

    It's obvious it's a binned 8700k, and it's obvious Intel want some of that silicon lottery cash.

    I still expect these chips to be binned further for outrageous prices by 3rd parties if at all possible.

    But it is interesting, I eouwould be surprised if less 8700k able to get 5ghz or over appear as Intel basically holds that stock back for the new 8086
     
  5. X-Mikuru_Beam-X

    Hitman

    Joined: 15 Oct 2014

    Posts: 746

    Location: Somerset England

    Only 5ghz on one core for this 8086K? Isn’t that false advertising then if the other cores arnt as fast?
     
  6. Toasty

    Mobster

    Joined: 21 Oct 2002

    Posts: 2,593

    Location: Sunderland

    Don’t they always quote max turbo boost which is always on one core ? Could very well be a 4790k situation as those later 4770k were rubbish clockers due to intel binning all the good ones for the incoming devils canyon.
     
  7. Dirk Diggler

    Capodecina

    Joined: 6 Jan 2013

    Posts: 16,893

    For a company the size of OCuK, the binning process makes sense, but for Intel I highly doubt it. That's a lot of effort in an attempt to squeeze a little bit of cash out of the enthusiast segment?
     
  8. eddiew

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 26 Jan 2007

    Posts: 2,262

    Location: Leeds

    This, really. Seems like there must be tens or hundreds of mundane office and home PCs for every enthusiast with a bleeding edge rig. Doesn't seem worth the effort purely for profit; far more money in low-midrange laptops!
     
  9. sideways14a

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 31 Aug 2017

    Posts: 2,209

    I am surprised folk seem to be
    Thats exactly the way all the other processors with boost are marketed.
    You dont think you get 4.7Ghz on all cores boost with he 8700k or 4.4Ghz on all the cores in a 7980XE do you?
    They cant run them all at that speed.
     
  10. BongoHunter

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 14 Apr 2014

    Posts: 2,350

    Location: West London

    think theyre aiming for 5gz turbo as it's 1000 times the speed of the chip their doing this as the 40th aniversry for - kinda neat!
     
  11. BTVA

    Gangster

    Joined: 12 Jan 2017

    Posts: 406

    Or they can bin the chip according to a well known batch of silicon and manufacturer process just like Haswell-E "J batch". Our binning process is rather "primitive" because we don't know internally or have some sort of machinery to scan the voltage leakage of the chip, I bet Intel does have all that.
    For 8700K, early batches L729C, L740C/D, L739C, L751D,etc... seems to go 5.2Ghz and beyond easily, just a hypothesis but most of them have a C or D in the middle.
     
  12. Gibbo

    Commissario

    Joined: 17 Oct 2002

    Posts: 34,422

    Location: OcUK HQ

    Hi there

    Coming soon.......
     
    Last edited: 31 May 2018
  13. ubersonic

    Capodecina

    Joined: 26 May 2009

    Posts: 21,110

    I love the way all the news sites reported it as the first CPU to hit 5GHz out of the box then had to edit that to first Intel CPU :p

    Also it's 16 years behind schedule, oh well, hopefully they hit their next big milestone (8-10GHz by the end of 2005) :D
     
  14. Journey

    Sgarrista

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 9,919

    Location: West Midlands

    Can't be in breach of a NDA if you didn't sign one, and you are simply listing what a disti is showing you ;)


    In other news, deliveries confirmed for 20th June, will see if that happens based on Intel's past (recent) performance with processor releases, I'd imagine some slippage would be embarrassing
     
  15. eddiew

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 26 Jan 2007

    Posts: 2,262

    Location: Leeds

    So, toothpaste confirmed? :(

    Also, don't suppose you'd consider a delid-lottery option? Feels like a lot of folks would pay £50 to pop the top just for the temps :)
     
  16. sideways14a

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 31 Aug 2017

    Posts: 2,209

    Almost certain to be toothpaste, intel aint going to run a new line just to put solder on a few very high end chips.

    Basically this is just an 8700k with a boost of a few hundred mhz more as its binned better, doubt its anything more than that.
    Its a bit expensive for only a 6 core but then folk are paying stupid money for binned and delidded chips elsewhere so why not...
     
  17. Gibbo

    Commissario

    Joined: 17 Oct 2002

    Posts: 34,422

    Location: OcUK HQ

    Removed
     
    Last edited: 31 May 2018
  18. Journey

    Sgarrista

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 9,919

    Location: West Midlands

    Indeed, this sort of illegal under the table practice happens in a lot of industries, and it is disgusting. Just another way to have the people selling your product on a leash, completely anti-competitive and only helps the manufacturer of the product not the end users, it's vile, abhorrent and outdated. :mad:

    See, above if you signed an NDA, then fair play, if you didn't then you are simply allowing the former to happen.
     
  19. SiDeards73

    Soldato

    Joined: 19 Feb 2011

    Posts: 5,843

    This..

    The common man is not buying this Anniversary chip, the OEM's are not buying this Anniversary chip, these are aimed at Intel enthusiasts, Intel will bin these and charge for it, and then they will get binned further as Gibbo above states.

    Wouldnt suprise me if as above, the earlier batches of C and D have been stockpiled further by Intel and any other magic batches they have identified..

    This could well become relevant with the AMD 7nm stuff as well, Lisa Su has said different products at different foundries, but we all know if they hit a homerun with one product and cant keep up demand they will move it to the other foundry, then you will end up playing the lottery with those chips etc.

    Anyhow, this is just a rebadged top tier 8700k :)
     
  20. Gibbo

    Commissario

    Joined: 17 Oct 2002

    Posts: 34,422

    Location: OcUK HQ

    Removed
     
    Last edited: 31 May 2018