• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Expresses its Displeasure Over Intel's PT Benchmarks for 9th Gen Core

Soldato
Joined
19 Dec 2003
Posts
7,212
Location
Grimsby, UK
TechPowerUp | Posted: 19 October 2018 said:
AMD gave its first major reaction to the Principled Technologies (PT) controversy, in which it came out strongly against the questionable methods PT employed, in its performance comparison between the Core i9-9900K and AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, in addition to certain other Ryzen Threadripper series products. In its response, AMD made its official position on controversy clear - it is not happy with PT.

AMD prepared a long list of flaws with PT's original testing, and the areas where it did not correct the mistakes in its second testing. The company also put out a list of its own "best practices" for comparative benchmarking, which prescribes "sanitizing the operating system," "sanitizing the platform" for stock vs. overclocked testing, "sanitizing the data," and to not create a vast disconnect between the test environment and the real-world.
Source: TechPowerUp

EDIT: Altered the AMD presentations below the maximum of 1280 pixels wide, as per OcUK forum rules.

YM1I318.jpg iKhpYJP.jpg
 
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,045
Windows 10 is a nightmare for a testing environment - so many background tasks including stuff like the Malware protection engine, Installer modules, various media, etc. scanning processes and so on can and will jump in whenever they feel like it using completely random amounts of system resources and easily skew results unless you do multiples of multiples of testing spread out to get an average :(
 
Back
Top Bottom