1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Anyone used the Nikon 16-35mm F4 VR ?

Discussion in 'Photography & Video' started by 86JR, 5 Jun 2010.

  1. 86JR

    PermaBanned

    Joined: 19 Oct 2007

    Posts: 6,322

    Location: .

    Im pretty 100% sure im going to use this with my D70 after a few days of research, and then add the 70-200 VR mk1 when i find one, and use my feet and the 16-35 at 35mm to bridge the gap. Plus my 50mm prime!

    I feel this lens is a better purchase than the 14-24, it has VR, i have dyspraxia, so shakey hands, so thats good, its wide but has barrel distortion, which is fixable in CS5, and when i eventually upgrade to a D700, its very wide!

    I also want to buy the Hoya 77mm kit, being that the thread for both eventual lenses is 77mm, this is kind of good :)

    I need to get my camera checked out by someone with lots of experience, or a shop, can anyone suggest one ?
     
  2. Rollo

    Gangster

    Joined: 29 Mar 2007

    Posts: 130

    Someone with lots of experience will tell you not to buy a £900 lenses when you don't know what you're doing. Shoot with what you have.
     
  3. bigredshark

    Man of Honour

    Joined: 30 Jun 2005

    Posts: 9,516

    Location: London Town!

    Yes, I've spent a few days with one. It's very sharp indeed but it's also slower than the older (Still available) 17-35 f2.8 which might matter depending what you shoot, 90% of the time VR was no help to me (I generally think it's less useful on wide angles as opposed to telephotos anyway).

    I'd also endorse the previous comment, on a D70 the 18-70, 18-55 VR or 16-85 VR is almost exactly as capable...

    EDIT: Oh, lastly, keep in mind it's a big heavy lens like you'd expect for a pro quality wide zoom...
     
  4. Stupot_

    Mobster

    Joined: 20 Sep 2009

    Posts: 2,923

    Location: Portsmouth

    What he said.


    your kit is perfectly capable. We've all seen your photos, learn how to use it, reach its limits, then get back to us with spec me threads:)
     
  5. D.P.

    Caporegime

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 31,552

    Seems an utterly pinltess lens on a DX camera. Buy a 16-85 instead.