BMW and M Power Owners

nas

nas

Associate
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Posts
1,060
He's right though. No one in the market for a 4 is also in the market for an 8. They are massively different propositions at massively different price points.

To say you'd buy one over the other purely on cosmetics misses the point entirely.
Think the essence of the original point is being taken out of proportion, which primarily surrounded the rationale behind pouring money into a new vehicle for it to in effect resemble another higher in the range.
 
Soldato
Joined
8 Nov 2006
Posts
22,979
Location
London
Think the essence of the original point is being taken out of proportion, which primarily surrounded the rationale behind pouring money into a new vehicle for it to in effect resemble another higher in the range.

It doesn't really though does it. One is a sports car which you can take on a track whilst the other is GT car made for luxury. Also even with mods the prices are still far apart.
 

nas

nas

Associate
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Posts
1,060
It doesn't really though does it. One is a sports car which you can take on a track whilst the other is GT car made for luxury. Also even with mods the prices are still far apart.

It's not as if the comparison is between a 1 series and an X7. The 4 and 8 in this instance are both coupes and neither are cheap.
 
Soldato
Joined
8 Nov 2006
Posts
22,979
Location
London
It's not as if the comparison is between a 1 series and an X7. The 4 and 8 in this instance are both coupes and neither are cheap.

An M4 competition is £75k whilst an M8 competition is £125k. The M4 is much cheaper.

Saying its not as bad as a 1 series vs an X7 is a silly comment. Nor is saying neither are cheap. By your definition you consider all cars above £75k not cheap, in which case you might as well start comparing it to a 570s? Another coupe.
 

nas

nas

Associate
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Posts
1,060
I could equally say that paradigms 'massively different' comment in response to my initial post on the looks is a bit of an exaggeration as I don't particularly agree there but hey, everyone's entitled to a view. You're also referring to the variants interchangeably :

GT car made for luxury.

which I presume to be the standard 8 series, and the M8C :

M8 competition is £125k

Not sure what exactly are you trying to prove or disprove, as I would guess that by your definition of the M4, the M8C would surely sit in the same category of sports car you can take on track. The obsession with either being right or trying to prove others wrong on here is incredible.
 
Soldato
Joined
8 Nov 2006
Posts
22,979
Location
London
They do not attract the same buyer. It's silly to say they are interchangeable.

An M4 buyer will not suddenly consider an M8.

You are trying to make the differences sound trivial by giving a separate outlandish comparison of the 1 series and X7 as the yardstick of being different. Completely different prices, but to you they are both expensive cars and are therefore similar.
 
Last edited:

nas

nas

Associate
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Posts
1,060
They do not attract the same buyer. It's silly to say they are interchangeable.

It's you that's drawing reference to both models to somewhat push the validity of whatever point you're attempting to get across. It's either the 8 series or the M8C you are speaking of, and in trying to be correct, you're moving the goal posts by mentioning both.

An M4 buyer will not suddenly consider an M8.

Factual or anecdotal? Happy to concede if you can provide any factual evidence to support this, although I would agree that an M4 buyer wouldn't suddenly consider a brand new M8.

You are trying to make the differences sound trivial by giving a separate outlandish comparison of the 1 series and X7 as the yardstick of being different. Completely different prices, but to you they are both expensive cars and are therefore similar.

I've already pointed out the fundamental basis by which they are comparible, the stark variance in price is only apparent when comparing brand new with brand new, guessing we're going with the £125k M8C then?

Unless there have been any fundamental changes since the release of G15 to the extent where you are missing out on something so significant that serves as a justification for making buying a brand new one essential, I can't see why an approved used M8C wouldn't be considered as an alternative as this isn't at all much more than a G82 M4.

Given the price of both in relation to the avg spend on a car in the UK, I do stand by my comment that objectively, neither are cheap. If by your standards they are in fact cheap, then well done for being successful enough to enjoy such things.

Time for a coffee, Fox this is your fault. :o
 
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
159,619
Factual or anecdotal?

Of course its possible someone may consider and M4 and instead decide on an M8, but it's unlikely and they'll be in the minority. Just like sometimes people consider a 430 Coupe and go on to buy an X5.

Generally though, the cars are different and only look similar on paper - yes, they are both fast 2 door BMW coupes. But this is where the similarity ends, in the same way that the similarity between a 3 Series and a 7 Series ends at '4 door BMW saloon'. The 8 Series is a big, heavy, fast GT designed to drive you across Germany in a few hours in complete comfort with crushingly effortless performance. Whereas the 4 Series is the sporty coupe of the BMW range - it's for people who value sharpness and involvement over cossetting luxury. It is rare the two buyers overlap - but obviously it does occasionally happen.
 

NVP

NVP

Soldato
Joined
6 Sep 2007
Posts
12,649
Guys, after I stopped working in MK I lost access to Deustche Tech and have struggled to find any decent BMW specialist locally - needed to pop on some fresh pads before I take the family on holiday today so called around a million places and found a random new place which has opened literally 3 minutes from my house which advertises "Tyres and Mechanic" so thought they can't be worse than anything else in Solihull...

...anyway, lovely couple guys - changed my brake pads and did an oil service (I supplied pads/sensors, oil and filter) for £250 on an F11 - is this a good price? If so I'm going to drop my wife's car to them as well, as I have no complaints.

Thanks :)
 
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
159,619
Brake pads and oil change is 90 minutes or so for a professional. If you supplied the parts then I guess it's up to you whether you consider £250 good value for a job of that length from a tyre place.
 

Jez

Jez

Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
33,073
You could surely have changed the pads and swapped the oil in less time than it took to make all of those calls and then drop it down/walk back/wait or whatever you did :p

I understand outsourcing complex engine or transmission work of course, and i also understand using a main franchised agent to maintain the paperwork where it matters to you, but why bother with a place like that....
 

NVP

NVP

Soldato
Joined
6 Sep 2007
Posts
12,649
That was the plan, that's why I'd bought everything separately but my wife said something like "why are you planning to do something you've never done before the day before we take the kids on a road trip...?" Which swayed me :D
 
Back
Top Bottom