1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Chemical Weapons Factory found

Discussion in 'GD Archive' started by 2blue4u, 24 Mar 2003.

  1. 2blue4u

    Man of Honour

    Joined: 17 Oct 2002

    Posts: 50,524

    and sealed off.

    Just reported on Sky News.
     
  2. Sleepy

    PermaBanned

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 7,394

    Location: Leicestershire

    Chemical Weapon Plant Captured

    Sky News

    Pentagon Confirm Chemical Weapon facility captured. General in charge captured by US forces


    Jerusalem Post Article
     
  3. Kerazee

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 28 Oct 2002

    Posts: 1,174

    Location: Somewhere, maybe nowhere

    not a suprise really - always said that there are things out there that our government knows about but wont tell us.
     
  4. Greg

    Sgarrista

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 8,973

    at long last . . .
     
  5. Marcus

    Closed

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 870

    It might be a bit premature to get to excited about it though. Initial reports have a habit of getting 'clarifed' later on. I wonder if the troops that found this are qualified to tell the difference between a chemical plant and a chemical weapons plant.

    I hope it IS a weapons plant - it will, as has been said, rather make Blair's and Bush's case for them - but I guess we'll have to wait and see.
     
  6. Exorcist

    Capodecina

    Joined: 10 Nov 2002

    Posts: 13,329

    Location: Manchester Airport

    if this gets 100% confirmed then

    a/ Where are the chemical weapons?

    b/ Will this get the sheep at the UN onboard?

    c/ Will this stop the pathetic anti war demonstrations?

    No to B an C i reckon. :rolleyes:
     
  7. Sleepy

    PermaBanned

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 7,394

    Location: Leicestershire

    The captured general would know the difference.
     
  8. 2blue4u

    Man of Honour

    Joined: 17 Oct 2002

    Posts: 50,524

    I doubt if they would screw up over something like this. It seems that they have also captured the General who was in charge of the factory. And, unlike most chemical plants that can be easily used/converted for weapons production, it seems that this establishment was solely for weapons manufacture.
     
  9. Kerazee

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 28 Oct 2002

    Posts: 1,174

    Location: Somewhere, maybe nowhere

    tbh m8 any chemical plant is generally capable of creating chemicals for use in weapons. All the equiptment used is the same - it just depends on what it is used for.
     
  10. The Running Man

    Caporegime

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 34,065

    Location: block 16, cell 12

    i hope everything that has transpired so far will shut those anti war protestors up.

    can they not see?!

    are they blind?

    here's hoping for a confirmed report soon.
     
  11. Greg

    Sgarrista

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 8,973

    [​IMG]

    confirmed AFAIK

    Greg
     
  12. Sleepy

    PermaBanned

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 7,394

    Location: Leicestershire

    Sky News

    Interviewing US journalist at the pentagon who is refuting Sky News line that the pentagon has confirmed the Jerusalem Post story. Which has originated from its embedded journalist with 3ID
     
  13. LizardKing

    Sgarrista

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 7,689

    Location: The Land of Roundabouts


    True but why would you need to "camouflarge" a general chemical plant.

    But i still wouldnt take it to serous, we only have a US version of the story, confirmed or not comfirmed id still be dubious
     
  14. dirtydog

    PermaBanned

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 47,398

    Location: Essex

    As soon as I saw the thread title, I knew there would be lots of people saying 'that'll shut the anti war people up' :D

    Some antis, me included, never said he didn't have banned chem/bio weapons. Don't wanna reopen the whole debate again in this thread 'well what would you do about it then? he had 12 years' etc as it's been flogged to death then flogged some more ;) But just for the record.

    I still don't believe the war is just though. Having weapons and having an intent to use them are two different things altogether.

    Let's just hope he DOESN'T have lots of weapons like that, in a usable form, as if we back him into a corner where he has nothing to lose, he might just use them. And bearing in mind the US said they would use nukes? (I think they said?) if Saddam used WMDs against troops, it could turn very nasty indeed. Nuke Iraq, make enemies of the entire middle east.. Saddam dies a martyr.. let's hope that isn't Saddam's master plan.
     
  15. Marcus

    Closed

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 870

    The army may not have screwed up though. If they reported it as a 'suspected' weapons factory and the press got a bit over-enthusiastic at the notion of such a hot story, and mitted the suspected, then .......

    After all, the quoted report in this thread does say it is perhaps the first illegal chemical plant found. That could be taken to mean it is perhaps the first, or it is perhaps illegal.

    Maybe. He may just be aware there is a chemical plant there, but not the details of what goes on there.

    Anyway, like I said, I hope it pans out the way it is being reported. But only a bit of time will tell. And ofr confirmation, the US really needs to gwet a couple of UN inspectors in there post haste - or there will be claims it is a put-up job.

    It is, however, my belief that this sort of find was inevitable sooner or later.
     
  16. 2blue4u

    Man of Honour

    Joined: 17 Oct 2002

    Posts: 50,524

    But he already has a track record of having used them. A fact so often conveniently skirted around by some.
     
  17. Marcus

    Closed

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 870

    There is not much point having a weapon if you have no intent to use it. The only question is what circumstances you would use it under. As en example, the UK's possession of a nuclear deterrrent. To be effective, people have to believe you will use it - if the right need arises (like as a response to a nuclear attack).

    Saddam, however, has proved on many occasions that he is fully prepared to use chemical weapons - and on civilian populations at that.
     
  18. dirtydog

    PermaBanned

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 47,398

    Location: Essex

    He didn't use them against us in the last gulf war.. why? Probably because of the deterrent effect.. he knew he would face massive retaliation.

    That is why I believe he would never have used them against us.

    This time may be different, if he feels he has nothing to lose and is going to die anyway.

    Also I'll post this story again for those who didn't catch it before.. Halabja
     
    Last edited: 24 Mar 2003
  19. Sleepy

    PermaBanned

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 7,394

    Location: Leicestershire

    Unattributted Senior Pentagon Official confirmed story to Fox news and hence to Sky News
     
  20. Marcus

    Closed

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 870

    It could be a plant producing rocket fuel - or something else that is likely to be a legitimate military target, but not a chemical weapons plant.

    The Iraqi's know that the US are capable of bombing such plants - it has happened before. The best way to avoid that is to hide them.