1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

    Dismiss Notice

CPU crunchtime

Discussion in 'CPUs' started by Booner!, 8 Mar 2006.

  1. Booner!

    Sgarrista

    Joined: 29 Sep 2005

    Posts: 9,129

    so i have decided upon the bulk of my order with OcUK but still deciding on the chip as after checking out the AMD 64 bit 4000+ san diego its alot faster in gaming benchmarks than the opty 165 up. so the chip look like it will be the san diego (overclock with water cooling). but how long until a single core san diego needs updating? will it last a year, or is it worth going Dual core. i just want gaming performance..
     
    Last edited: 8 Mar 2006
  2. the.m

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 19 Dec 2002

    Posts: 2,083

    Location: Gilston

    I wouldnt start worrying about how long it will last as in the world of high end computers as things change by the week now. your chip will be out of date in months..... but it matters not one bit because that 4000 processor will do what ever you want in terms of playing any game you like to mention, and will do for a long time.
     
  3. volt9291

    Hitman

    Joined: 2 Feb 2006

    Posts: 614

    If you have the money go dual core it will be better
     
  4. easyrider

    Caporegime

    Joined: 24 Dec 2005

    Posts: 39,774

    Location: Autonomy

    As you will be using watercooling go for the dual core.You will more than likely get 2.7-2.8ghz with the 165.

    This will give you gaming performance and wipe the floor with the single core varients in future games.