Caporegime
Best be nice to blm, by 2050 white people will be a minority in the uk.
Declining attitude to law and order
- Thread starter MookJong
- Start date
- Status
Commissario
Can we plase get this thread somewhat back on track.
Caporegime
Exactly, with current crime rates imagine a 50% + ethnically diverse population. It could be chaos out there.
Poverty attracts criminality, even Aristotle understood this, yet here you are.
I pose the question, why is it that somewhere like Singapore with a larger demographic divergence, isn't currently 'chaotic'?
Last edited:
Caporegime
Criminality results in poverty.
I have to ask, what is it that you think is objectively a bad thing about this?
I am trying to think of something that isn't just down to garden variety racism and am drawing a blank, so please help me understand your thinking.
Well yes, it is a cycle, like most things?
The criminality is itself a vested interest that grows without intervention and no... the police are a plaster, not intervention.
Caporegime
Free housing, free education, free food, free health care.
We aren't talking absolute poverty here. We are taking about all the basics plus more being provided free of charge.
The starving people of Somalia live in poverty. The people living in council flats in Brixton are not.
Do you really think the people being exploited here are wondering about their subsidised life?
Caporegime
Exploited?
The ones being exploited are the innocent tax payers and knife crime/sexual attack victims paying for it.
So you really think people are born this way? Born with knives in their pocket?
Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Feb 2018
- Posts
- 13,162
Caporegime
Somebody puts them there. But clearly they do not live in life threatening poverty before they do...
Soldato
Where in the link on which you base this analysis does it mention that Tatiana Turner (a WHITE woman) was a "BLM organizer"
ps - In English, "There" is not the same as "Their"
Tatiana Turner is a black\biracial lady
There is a picture.....https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ganizer-plows-car-crowd-Trump-supporters.html
lolstockhausen
They don't need to live in 'life-threatening poverty', there merely has to be a perception of inequality and unsuccessful escape paths (schools which are filled with peers who may be in gangs). Nothing about this is particularly rational, it's entirely a self-imposed environment where the mother (father is likely screwed up from years of this environment) is far too busy earning a wage in however many jobs they may have.
Now i'll admit that this isn't as stark as say in the US (Chicago/LA in particular) because the UK has better provisions, police and no gun culture, but it's no less cyclical and once it begins it's hard to stop. I'll also admit that less immigration into these areas is probably sensible, however it won't do anything to actually stop the cycle of violence revolving around the people who're already suffering from it.
Though if we're talking about cost to the tax payer (which a lot of these families are, even if they're not net tax-payers, most of the country isn't), then just responding with more and more draconian actions is going to cost more in the long run. So frankly, if all you want to do is hurt these people who are themselves victims of a sordid environment, then as far as i'm concerned you're only endeavouring to hurt yourself in the process (more taxes, more victims).
How far are you willing to go? ID card system? Curfews? Regularly armed police? Presumed guilt? For-profit prisons? No benefit system for anyone? If it doesn't work in the US, why would it suddenly work in the UK?
Anyway as ever, I don't actually expect to change anyone's mind. You have reason to be angry, I just fundamentally disagree with the solutions.
Last edited:
Soldato
Because It's illegal to hold cause-related events without a valid licence from the authorities.
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 7,051
Why do you think that this is the case?
Caporegime
So it is a cultural/ racial problem?
The problem is blm are trying to stop people from pointing out the facts, but the ussues can't be tackles, much like the Asian grooming rape gangs in the northwest until the issue is presented, discussed and action taken.
Hiding it and trying to blame circumstances just isn't going to fix the problem we have right now.
Permabanned
Probably because they have the death sentence for murder, narcotic usage and narcotic supply, mandatory in many instances. Lesser criminals get a damn good beating. They have a very robust attitude to criminality in general hence they have one of the world's lowest crime rates. If I was being nasty I might say because they don't listen to people like you
These beatings are thought to be a very good deterrent, they are not some Billy Bunter affair, they are canings using a water soaked rattan cane of half inch diameter. The multiple strokes are administered under medical supervision by fit, robust men, and have to be given using all the strength they can muster on bare buttocks of the naked criminal in a partitioned off prison yard.
The recipient is tied to a trestle and often faints. The scars can be lifelong. The recipients are not told when they will be taken from their cells for punishment, which adds to the psychological trauma and apparently results in very few reoffending and coming back for more...
Misdemeanours and offences that can result in a beating include vandalism, graffitti, sexual molestation, grooming, sexual impropriety, illegal immigration, legal immigration that results in outstaying of passes, hiring illegal immigrants, transporting illegal immigrants, rioting, public order offences and many many more.
All these offences are highly prevalent in the UK, yet very rare in Singapore. One has to assume they don't "like it across `em".
All sounds good to me, the more I read the more I approved, bring it on!
Last edited:
Caporegime
Hmm I don't know...let me see, apart from the increase in crime and lawlessness and the stated aims of some BLM to make extinct 'whitey'...
We probably shouldn't support the ethnic cleansing of white people really.
Objectively speaking, why should we welcome it?
- Status