1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

electric ariel atom

Discussion in 'Motors' started by hsp70, 17 May 2006.

  1. hsp70


    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 871

    interesting video of some guy in america converting an atom to run via a motor racing a 360, and 911. Not your average milk float :p


    link to video on the website.
  2. Scottland


    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 15,322

    Location: North Wales

    Impressive, although I'd like to see it compared to a normal Atom. That or stick the electric engine in something of a similar stature to the 360/CarreraGT.
  3. chrislusty

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 14 Jul 2004

    Posts: 1,461

    Location: Caerphilly - S.Wales

    Yeah impressive, but in a long race the petrol car wins all the time :D

    I wonder what it would have been like up against the Atom.
    It doesnt seem right though watching it go that fast without any engine note. At least we could hear the 360 and 911.
  4. Rich1988


    Joined: 8 Jan 2005

    Posts: 6,366

    Location: wiltshire

    he makes it sound as if he built the whole car, doesnt mention that its british made!
  5. DanF


    Joined: 16 Feb 2004

    Posts: 3,845

    Location: London


    Nice figures:

    Last edited: 17 May 2006
  6. refuzion


    Joined: 12 Jan 2005

    Posts: 346

    Location: Walsall

    I've always wondered, wouldn't racing cars such as F1 benefit from using electric power over fuel? As these cars usually only do 30 or so laps before they refuel, the charge would last? Surely they'd save quite a bit of weight.
  7. GlasgowTitan

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 29 Jun 2005

    Posts: 1,416

    Location: Glasgow

    Not in the rules.
  8. Lithium


    Joined: 29 Oct 2002

    Posts: 807

    No because the energy required in an F1 race is more than a battery can provide.
  9. hsp70


    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 871

    batteries is the real letdown at the moment in terms of progression for electric powered vehicles, too small capacity, too expensive right now, and compared to petrol, takes too long to recharge.

    But they have so much potential, depending on the source of electricity they can be very environmentally friendly. Less moving parts so as reliable if not more so than conventional engines. Max torque at the get go, and amazing energy efficiency (something like 90% of the energy is actually used to move the vehicle, compared to the incredible waste of only 30% being motive force in petrol).
  10. SaBBz


    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 2,603

    Location: Elsewhere

    That would mean changing the battery at pit stops, or waiting for about 5 hours for it to charge. Saying that, it wouldn't make it any more boring to watch atm :o