1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

[email protected] - performance boost running WinXP-64?

Discussion in 'Team OcUK Distributed Computing Projects' started by DarkJedi, 19 Feb 2006.

  1. DarkJedi

    Associate

    Joined: 20 Nov 2005

    Posts: 52

    I'm currently running [email protected] on Windows XP Pro with an Athlon64 3700+ (SD), if I were to get WinXP 64-bit version...would there be much of a performance increase? assuming I had enough RAM for this of course...

    Has anyone experienced better performance on any other DC projects when switching from a 32-bit to a 64-bit OS?

    thanks
     
  2. Stan_Lite

    Man of Honour

    Joined: 27 Apr 2004

    Posts: 107,331

    Location: In bed with your sister

    At the moment there is no 64 bit client for [email protected]
    I tried running it with XP64 but it kept killing WUs. I thought it was a hardware problem so checked everything out. I eventually uninstalled XP64 and installed XPhome and, hey presto, it worked fine.

    I had a look on the Folding forums and some said it worked fine whilst some had the same problems as I did - I think it's a bit hit-or-miss at the moment. You might want to have a look over there to see what the latest opinions are.

    Stan :)
     
  3. BillytheImpaler

    Man of Honour

    Joined: 2 Aug 2005

    Posts: 8,741

    Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA

    Since FAH doesn't use any integers larger than 24 bits there will be no performance increase from the 32 bit client to the 64 bit client.

    FAH uses SSE/SSE2/SSE3 to perform calculations with up to 128 bits precision. 64 bit integers would be a stop down in performance.
     
  4. DarkJedi

    Associate

    Joined: 20 Nov 2005

    Posts: 52

  5. rich99million

    Sgarrista

    Joined: 26 Dec 2002

    Posts: 9,348

    Location: Derbyshire

    the forums are up - they are just extremely slow to respond :o
    edit: actually once the forums have loaded they aren't that slow to navigate - it's just the initial wait that makes it seem like they are down


    you may find the official FaHWiki more useful

    edit: tadaaaaa http://fahwiki.net/index.php/FAH_&_64-bit
     
    Last edited: 20 Feb 2006