Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 29,803
Yes, this is excellent and well worth it. Esp with the new LG firmware that further increases the Freesync range and reduces input lag
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Geforce GTX1180/2080 Speculation thread
- Thread starter Tommy_Here
- Start date
Yes, this is excellent and well worth it. Esp with the new LG firmware that further increases the Freesync range and reduces input lag
Associate
Sounds great, I have been waiting for a decent monitor to come along.Yes, this is excellent and well worth it. Esp with the new LG firmware that further increases the Freesync range and reduces input lag
Caporegime
Soldato
I think RTX is what has affected the quality of BFV. It's like a ball and chain around it's ankle. If they hadn't bothered with this crap they probably would have had enough time and engineering resources to build a better game.
Associate
IT JUST WORKS
Soldato
At the same time tho we want companies to innovate.
How boring would it have been if Nvidia had just released the 2000 series without RT.
Moar fps.... is it really that exciting?
How boring would it have been if Nvidia had just released the 2000 series without RT.
Moar fps.... is it really that exciting?
Soldato
It would have been for 4K resolution yes. The more cards that can do 4k the better.
I'd have preferred it if this generation meant more die space for cuda cores and rasterization performance improvements all the way down the line. Allowing the *50 class to become a 1440p/60 card, *60 to be a 4k/60, *70 a 4k/100 and *80 a 4k/144hz card, while keeping the costs in line with previous generations
It is if you're walking around staring into windows and puddles, that's about it.
Might have been a decent price then.
Don
The only thing that would have made it a decent price would have been decent AMD competition.
Not having a massive die with lots of additional development costs to recover would have helped.
Don
Nah, whilst AMD can't even meet the performance of Nvidia's last generation Nvidia will make hay regardless of how much it costs to make their GPU.
AMD would do (and have in the past) the same.
Well apparently they're not making hay as they've already blamed low turing sales as part of the reasons for their financial results.
It’s a good question in the context, but I reckon 4k at 120+ FPS on a 144hz monitor is more appealing than ray tracing.
Also considering they marketed this card as the first proper 4k card and there's already a couple of games that tank it below 60fps. Might not have been the case if they had forgone the rt and tensor cores and just went for all out performance.