Originally posted by burns
Groovey, 512 it is then I'm tempted to use ReiserFS, it sounds like it's going to be faster than ext3?
yeah use ReiserFS but only for your root partition and dont forget to compile it into your kernel
Originally posted by burns
Groovey, 512 it is then I'm tempted to use ReiserFS, it sounds like it's going to be faster than ext3?
Nope, but it saves me a little spaceOriginally posted by riven
does a smaller boot partiiton give any speed advantage?
Sounds goodOriginally posted by robmiller
Right, I'm going in, wish me luck
I've got 1gb of RAM, and so was planning on going
32mb Boot
256mb swap
rest of the disk as /root
Sound ok?
Usually yes, but there gets a point where it'll just be a waste of space. With 1G of ram the swap shouldn't even be used. I used 512MB RAM and I've never seen it use the swap before. 512MB should be more that enough.Originally posted by Deadly Ferret
I can't remember whether it was linux.org or gentoo.org, but I read earlier today that the swap partition should be equal to twice the physical memory.
Cool, I'll use ext3 on the others then.Originally posted by riven
yeah use ReiserFS but only for your root partition and dont forget to compile it into your kernel
It is faster, reiserfs is the fastest filesystem for small files like more of use have. XFS is faster if you move around very large files. I used Reiser4 for / and ext2 for /boot.Originally posted by burns
Groovey, 512 it is then I'm tempted to use ReiserFS, it sounds like it's going to be faster than ext3?
Originally posted by Mpemba Effect
It is faster, reiserfs is the fastest filesystem for small files like more of use have. XFS is faster if you move around very large files. I used Reiser4 for / and ext2 for /boot.
Cool, I'll use ext3 on the others then.
Originally posted by Deadly Ferret
I'm going with one (partition) for boot, one for root, one for home, and one for swap. I read that those are normal and in addition, a lot of people have one for usr, but I'm the only person who will be using the computer it's installed on so that seems redundant to me.
Originally posted by Deadly Ferret
Does it matter which order on the disk I put those?
If you're the only person using the machine I would say it's redundant it'll just just use up space partitioning. Obviously if you're installing a multiuser machine the something like /, /boot, /tmp, /var, /home would be good.Originally posted by Deadly Ferret
Does it matter which order on the disk I put those?
Try typingOriginally posted by burns
Yay, do I get a medal for being the first to screw up? I've formated my swap partition as ext3, didn't see riven's post on time. I did mkswap on it, but swapon says the device is busy. Damn.
swapoff /dev/hda2
mkswap /dev/hda2
swapon /dev/hda2
Sounds like a good planOriginally posted by Deadly Ferret
Thanks. Well what I was thinking was, and this is on a 40GB disk in a machine which will be used by me alone, to keep myself occupied whilst burning or doing other CPU intensive things on my main machine, this:
Boot - 32MB
Swap - 512MB
Root - 4048MB
Home - rest of disk
Reason for seperate home being so that files are kept seperate, so hopefully if I ever mess up the installation, I could save the files before reinstalling.
Sound okay?
I would make your root partition at least 10GB - I am already using 5.3GB. It needs to be that big because you wont have a seperate /usr partition to store programs. I would only make it that small if you know that you are only going to install a few programs and a lightweight gui. If you want to install gnome or kde, make it bigger than that, especially if you install games (enemy territory or americas army are good linux games) or something like openoffice.Originally posted by Deadly Ferret
Thanks. Well what I was thinking was, and this is on a 40GB disk in a machine which will be used by me alone, to keep myself occupied whilst burning or doing other CPU intensive things on my main machine, this:
Boot - 32MB
Swap - 512MB
Root - 4048MB
Home - rest of disk
Reason for seperate home being so that files are kept seperate, so hopefully if I ever mess up the installation, I could save the files before reinstalling.
Sound okay?
Thats true, didn't spot that Otherwise partition off /usr. Thats the standard metohd for Freebsd who's philosophy is to use / as little as possible.Originally posted by dav1d
I would make your root partition at least 10GB - I am already using 5.3GB. It needs to be that big because you wont have a seperate /usr partition to store programs. I would only make it that small if you know that you are only going to install a few programs and a lightweight gui. If you want to install gnome or kde, make it bigger than that, especially if you install games (enemy territory or americas army are good linux games) or something like openoffice.
How'd you manage that? /var is in the tarball, you don't need to create that directory unless you've decide to have a seperate partition for /varOriginally posted by robmiller
Made my first boo-boo; I untarred the stage into /var somehow deleting what I extracted then untarring into /