Oblivious said:They think its all Rover, it is now.
I don't think they will top that.. thread closed.. and goodnight
Oblivious said:They think its all Rover, it is now.
[TW]Fox said:Equally refined? What, despite being 4 cylinders to 6?
Fifthly, the ZT is more 5 series size.. my M5 is 400bhp and 369lb/ft from standard.. to compare like with like I could whack the Dinan kit on and a supercharger and be pushing 700bhp
Lithium said:Oh look some bmw noobs jumping into defend their cars cos of their tiny willy problems
Fairly soon my dads car will outperform an M3..
Thats a fact. 2006 ZT-260's can be had for £17k...unregistered with 2 miles on the clock. Add another £10k for some killer mods/labour and you got yourself an M3 killer.
agw_01 said:But I'm sure it's more fun to see the look on an M3 owners face as you dart past them in your old Rover.
Simon's Rover 220 for example
agw_01 said:But I'm sure it's more fun to see the look on an M3 owners face as you dart past them in your old Rover.
Simon's Rover 220 for example
Lithium said:Whats your job got to do with it?
Im 20 and own a 06 Golf GTI which is already paid for in full.... so?
Lithium said:Im 20 and own a 06 Golf GTI which is already paid for in full.... so?
[TW]Fox said:See if I spend £$23894839489304902859034936 on stuff my Mondeo would kill that.
Oblivious said:Will be better looking at the Rover drivers face. Because at the end of the day..... Its a rover, over.
agw_01 said:Fox, I'll have you know Si's 220 is quicker than the M3 CSL once moving.
agw_01 said:Wow, that shocked me! I'm actually suprised you didn't post something like "Lies. No chance!"