pugster said:
the ppl who say that women are of inferior strength /cant punch etc have obviously never seen a 5'3 9 stone woman glass a man ,ive seen a few women glass men /other women ,and even take a stilletto shoe off and swing it at someone ( the bloke almost lost an eye) , any woman comes at me or mine intent on doing damage will get the same in return whether it be a slap for throwing a punch at me that did not hurt or picking a glass up intending to put it in my face and getting a broken jaw for trying.
Oh, I think
on average women probably are weaker. But by how much? 1%? 5%? 10%? 20%?
Even if a woman is 20% weaker, it doesn't mean she can't do serious damage. But I agree with you. I think any man assuming he is sufficiently stronger that he can just restrain any woman attacking him is seriously underestimating many women.
Also, the ability to hurt is as much about knowing what you are doing as it is about sheer strength. A small well-trained man can easily hurt a much larger untrained one. Why should we assume women don't know what they are doing? After all, an increasing number have taken self-defence classes, let alone martial arts ones.
Clearly, there's a qualitative difference between a woman "slapping" a man (which in my case would earn a slap back), and one launching a serious attack (such as a drunken or drugged up woman having a real go). My response to the slap and to the drugged nutter having a go would evidently be different, but I'm NOT going to assumed that the drugged type can't seriously hurt me just because she's a woman.
Similarly, a drunken attack can either be a wild punch by someone so far gone they can barely see you, or it can be a seriously meant attack by someone drunk enough to be very belligerent but sober enough to be dangerous. Again, you react according to situation.
But, if a woman seriously attacks me, whether drunk/drugged or not, I'll react just as I would with a man and if that means doing my level best to knock her head off, so be it.