• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel unlocked 28-core Xeon W-3175X processor will not be soldered

Soldato
Joined
19 Dec 2003
Posts
7,212
Location
Grimsby, UK
Mark Campbell at OC3D | Posted: 10 October 2018 said:
Intel confirms that their unlocked 28-core Xeon W-3175X processor will not be soldered
When Intel announced their 9th Generation of Core and Core-X series processors, the company made a point to list the inclusion of a Solder Thermal Interface Material STIM) for both of their new product lines. This change will allow their new processors to transfer heat away from their silicon in a more efficient matter, lowering load temperatures while increasing overclocking headroom, especially on their new X299 series products.

Things are a little different with their planned Xeon W-3175X processor, Intel's unlocked 28-core monstrosity that is set to offer server-grade features, an insane core count and overclockability in a single package.

After considering Intel's use of their Xeon brand name and the company's already expensive 18-core i9-9980XE, which $1,979 RCP for 1K orders, it is undeniable that Intel's Xeon W-3175X will be ludicrously expensive, but the product has one crucial flaw that is worth mentioning.

When speaking to Anand Srivatsa, the vice president of Intel's desktop, systems and channel group, PC World confirmed that the company's unlocked Xeon will not feature Soldered TIM, instead relying on Intel's existing polymer-based thermal interface material. Intel's overclocking-ready Xeon will use a thermally limiting thermal interface material, a product which has a higher core count than any other unlocked Intel processor and is, therefore, most likely to be thermally restricted when overclocked.

You can watch PC World's interview with Anand Srivatsa in the video below.


The reason behind Intel's decision to use polymer-based TIM is clear, as no other product in their LGA3647 product stack uses STIM, making its use unfeasible for a low-volume product like the Xeon W-3175X. Even so, this design decision makes it likely that pro overclockers will need likely need to delid their W-3175X processors to achieve peak performance, which something that nobody should have to do on a processor that will be worth multiple thousand dollars.

Intel's reasoning behind their Xeon W-3175X processor is simple, it's a statement that says that still sit at the peak of the processor market. It says loud and clear that they can do better than AMD, at least right now, releasing a processor that offers 28 cores on a single die while offering higher clock speeds out of the box than AMD's Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and have direct access to six-channel memory channels. Intel doesn't intend to sell this processor in huge numbers; the Xeon W-3175X is a showpiece and little else.
Source: OC3D / PCWorld
 
Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,666
They want you to void the warranty to be able to overclock properly, marketing aside that's all there really is to the TIM use.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Posts
7,071
They want you to void the warranty to be able to overclock properly, marketing aside that's all there really is to the TIM use.

That actually makes a lot of sense. Overclockers are much more likely to have a warranty claim than your average user. I wonder if it has reduced warranty claims?
 
Soldato
Joined
12 May 2014
Posts
5,236
They want you to void the warranty to be able to overclock properly, marketing aside that's all there really is to the TIM use.

That actually makes a lot of sense. Overclockers are much more likely to have a warranty claim than your average user. I wonder if it has reduced warranty claims?

I think it might have to do with the fact that soldering doesn't have a 100% success rate and they probably can't afford to have these cherry picked CPUs die while being soldered.
 
Associate
Joined
31 Dec 2010
Posts
2,434
Location
Sussex
I think it might have to do with the fact that soldering doesn't have a 100% success rate and they probably can't afford to have these cherry picked CPUs die while being soldered.

Surely you mean:

"they probably can't afford to have these cherry picked CPU dies die while being soldered."
:)
 
Back
Top Bottom