Is this even broadband?

HaX

HaX

Associate
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
2,080
Location
Berkshire
That is without a doubt broadband, although relatively slow compared to the offerings on the market these days.

You should have tried being an internet user back in the days of 56 k modems. You would have got connection results of 0.040 mb if you were lucky!
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Oct 2007
Posts
5,321
Location
wubalubadubdub
That is without a doubt broadband, although relatively slow compared to the offerings on the market these days.

You should have tried being an internet user back in the days of 56 k modems. You would have got connection results of 0.040 mb if you were lucky!

the old man speaks the truth! :D
 
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
159,619
837606346.png


I win.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Oct 2007
Posts
5,321
Location
wubalubadubdub
No. It's 512 Kb/s.

ok i got the b and p worng way round on my post but..

512 kbps = kilobits per second
512 kb/s = kilobytes per second

the way they write it on that results page mb/s is actually incorrect

EDIT: also heres a list of each countrys 'average' speed http://www.netindex.com/download/allcountries/ at least your doing a little better than Zimbabwe :D
 
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Joined
29 Mar 2003
Posts
56,811
Location
Stoke on Trent
I can't do the maths - what do the figures in the OP relate to if it shows up as kbps?

A young mate of mine is really useless with computers and one day he complained his internet was slow so could I look at his machine.
I went round his house, ran Broadband Speed Checker and it came up as 154kbps where in my house it came up as 9,920kbps.
I ran a laptop in his house and it was slow, bought his PC to my house where it was normal therefore I deducted something was wrong with either his modem or provider.
Every week he would ring me to tell me it was super slow and I kept telling him to ring his provider.
5 months later :eek: I ended up going round his house and ringing up the provider who then sent a new modem.
How could anybody put up with those speeds for 5 months?
 
Caporegime
Joined
12 Mar 2009
Posts
26,776
You can't really vouch for the credibility of the results of a single speedtest. You should do at least 3 or 4 at different times of the day and then work out the average. :)
 
Soldato
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Posts
2,605
here's BT 5 miles from exchange and only ISP we can have...

Are you sure you're limited to just BT?

Even if there's no cable or LLU services at your area/exchange, you should be able to get a provider using BTW service (or whatever it's called).
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
26,098
Very unlikely mobile broadband will be 'better' than fixed-line for a long time. The biggest impact on browsing is latency, and 3G has loads of it.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
30 Jun 2005
Posts
9,515
Location
London Town!
Broadband is at the end of the day just a marketing term, it has no technical meaning at all. Typically anything above ISDN speeds would be classed broadband by the marketing folk (and all below narrowband obviously enough) but it's just marketing speak, it was once used as a interchangeable term with xDSL but that's long since gone and the variety of EUA networks means it's purely marketing these days...
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Jun 2003
Posts
4,368
Location
Rugeley
Are you sure you're limited to just BT?

Even if there's no cable or LLU services at your area/exchange, you should be able to get a provider using BTW service (or whatever it's called).

Tried, once you actually try and order they say they can't do it. AOL used to supply but they don't anymore. Small exchange (sub 500 subscribers) is our problem!
 
Back
Top Bottom