1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

    Dismiss Notice

Laptop - Sempron 3100+ Vs Cel-M 380 1.6GHz

Discussion in 'CPUs' started by siclilmonkey, 24 Mar 2006.

  1. siclilmonkey

    Hitman

    Joined: 18 Oct 2005

    Posts: 563

    as the title sais

    whats gona give me better proformance

    (same spec laptop)

    Sempron 3100+

    Vs

    Celeron-M 380 1.6GHz

    for the laptop im gona buy

    ta :)
     
  2. Defcon5

    Soldato

    Joined: 4 Sep 2005

    Posts: 6,424

    Location: Whitwood, West Yorks

    i dont have any evidence to back this up but id say the sempron without a doubt
     
  3. m3csl2004

    Hitman

    Joined: 17 Jun 2005

    Posts: 621

    Location: Sheffield

    why?


    celeron
     
  4. Defcon5

    Soldato

    Joined: 4 Sep 2005

    Posts: 6,424

    Location: Whitwood, West Yorks

    Just from previous posts from people. but then again its pro amd round these neck of the woods.
     
  5. ajgoodfellow

    Capodecina

    Joined: 24 Dec 2004

    Posts: 11,343

    Location: Shirley, Solihull, UK

    Go for the Celeron

    It's the Celeron M which is based on the Pentium M but with half the cache. It's still a fast CPU

    If it was against a Celeron D, then the Sempron without a doubt, but against the Celeron M then the Celeron is quicker

    The Celeron M has 1.6GHz and 1MB cache, the Sempron has 1.8GHz but only 256KB cache. The Celeron M is also quicker clock for clock than the Sempron
     
  6. m3csl2004

    Hitman

    Joined: 17 Jun 2005

    Posts: 621

    Location: Sheffield

    exactly - also its a true mobile cpu so should see better bettery life
     
  7. ajgoodfellow

    Capodecina

    Joined: 24 Dec 2004

    Posts: 11,343

    Location: Shirley, Solihull, UK

    Not necessarily as the Celeron M doesn't have speedstep so battery life isn't all that good :)
     
  8. siclilmonkey

    Hitman

    Joined: 18 Oct 2005

    Posts: 563

    chears :)

    gona buy the celeron m one soon :) thanks