Man sends banana to black mans table in Wetherspoons pub

Status
Not open for further replies.
Man of Honour
Joined
29 Mar 2003
Posts
56,808
Location
Stoke on Trent
Still haven't had a coherent response to my question.

Please say you are joking.

Thugs > black footballers look like monkeys > monkeys eat bananas > throw one at a black player > just a laugh, grow up and get over it.

For decades black players have just had to get on with it but why should they?
Now somebody has decided to do it on a bloke in a pub.
 
Caporegime
Joined
23 Dec 2011
Posts
32,917
Location
Northern England
Please say you are joking.

Thugs > black footballers look like monkeys > monkeys eat bananas > throw one at a black player > just a laugh, grow up and get over it.

For decades black players have just had to get on with it but why should they?
Now somebody has decided to do it on a bloke in a pub.

Why should anyone put up with anything? They shouldn't but it still shouldn't be a criminal matter. Societal change is the important bit.
 

NVP

NVP

Soldato
Joined
6 Sep 2007
Posts
12,649
You guys are giving too little credit to their intelligence, it isn't willful ignorance it is an excuse for superiority.


I'm pretty sure you could use this thread to quite accurately determine which users do not have friends outside of their own race.
 
Caporegime
Joined
23 Dec 2011
Posts
32,917
Location
Northern England
Don't be that guy, come on. You know damn well that "grow a thicker skin" doesn't apply here, there is a whole plethora of variables which haven't been taken in to consideration.


Fundamentally though that's what it comes down to. Hurtful words.

Like I said at the start of the thread many other people have been bullied, shamed, abused because of their physical appearance. Traits they cannot choose and shouldn't change. Why should they not be afforded the same level of protection and ultimately why should hurt feelings be a crime?

Where there is no threat of violence or discrimination, implied or direct, it shouldn't be a criminal matter.
 
Soldato
Joined
2 May 2011
Posts
11,878
Location
Woking
Fundamentally though that's what it comes down to. Hurtful words.

Like I said at the start of the thread many other people have been bullied, shamed, abused because of their physical appearance. Traits they cannot choose and shouldn't change. Why should they not be afforded the same level of protection and ultimately why should hurt feelings be a crime?

Where there is no threat of violence or discrimination, implied or direct, it shouldn't be a criminal matter.

Because your desensitizing one of the most contentious and disgraceful issues in human history.
 
Caporegime
Joined
23 Dec 2011
Posts
32,917
Location
Northern England
Because your desensitizing one of the most contentious and disgraceful issues in human history.

And how is that any different to insults based on any uncontrolled aspect of someone's appearance? Simply put, to the individual it isn't.
Someone will feel no different to being called a monkey because they're black to being called a tramp because they have ginger hair.
The outcome should be the same for both. That outcome should not be criminal.
 
Soldato
Joined
2 May 2011
Posts
11,878
Location
Woking
And how is that any different to insults based on any uncontrolled aspect of someone's appearance? Simply put, to the individual it isn't.
Someone will feel no different to being called a monkey because they're black to being called a tramp because they have ginger hair.
The outcome should be the same for both. That outcome should not be criminal.

We've been over this in this thread. No one has been enslaved or generations of their families persecuted because they were short or ginger.
 
Caporegime
Joined
23 Dec 2011
Posts
32,917
Location
Northern England
We've been over this in this thread. No one has been enslaved or generations of their families persecuted because they were short or ginger.

What relevance does the past have to an individual? None whatsoever. This guy wasn't a slave, his parents weren't, his grandparents weren't. In fact it's highly unlikely he's descended from slaves at all.
Trying telling a kid who comes home crying from school every day because they're bullied about their hair, or glasses or whatever that, sorry, your feelings don't matter as much because someone 400 years ago wasn't oppressed because of it.
 

NVP

NVP

Soldato
Joined
6 Sep 2007
Posts
12,649
Whilst we're on that topic again... could the abuse given to ginger people, from the playground to the workplace, become protected under some celtic race argument?

e: Wait no! Not the abuse protected, but the people. You know what I mean.
 
Caporegime
Joined
23 Dec 2011
Posts
32,917
Location
Northern England
Whilst we're on that topic again... could the abuse given to ginger people, from the playground to the workplace, become protected under some celtic race argument?

e: Wait no! Not the abuse protected, but the people. You know what I mean.

Lol. Good edit. Probably not as not only celts are ginger and tbh are largely extinct as a discrete population.
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Dec 2010
Posts
7,378
Please say you are joking.

Thugs > black footballers look like monkeys > monkeys eat bananas > throw one at a black player > just a laugh, grow up and get over it.

For decades black players have just had to get on with it but why should they?
Now somebody has decided to do it on a bloke in a pub.

But we're all descendants from apes, no matter the creed or colour.
 
Soldato
Joined
2 May 2011
Posts
11,878
Location
Woking
What relevance does the past have to an individual? None whatsoever. This guy wasn't a slave, his parents weren't, his grandparents weren't. In fact it's highly unlikely he's descended from slaves at all.
Trying telling a kid who comes home crying from school every day because they're bullied about their hair, or glasses or whatever that, sorry, your feelings don't matter as much because someone 400 years ago wasn't oppressed because of it.

It has relevance because it led to sub-human treatment of endless Africans, and we’re still climbing back from that position.

But we're all descendants from apes, no matter the creed or colour.

We share a common ancestor...
 
Caporegime
Joined
23 Dec 2011
Posts
32,917
Location
Northern England
It has relevance because it led to sub-human treatment of endless Africans, and we’re still climbing back from that position.



We share a common ancestor...

It wasn't endless and it happened hundreds of years ago, it's literally beyond living memory. How far back do you want to go? And again, will you be willing to stand in front of a child, who's afraid of going back to school or to football or anywhere because they're being picked on over something beyond their control and say...tough break kid, you're not black so you don't matter?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom