Although it's early days for Cell it should have a fairly rapid take up for compute farms etc. As its based on a lot of Power technology there's not too much difference in terms of code. A lot of the Top 500 supercomputers are running Power or similar CPUs like Blue Gene and so moving these kind of applications to Cell is not as difficult as porting to a whole new architecture.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Mercury puts Cell processor on a PCI-E card
- Thread starter dafloppyone
- Start date
Associate
They could if they were coded for it, but the REAL question is...Concorde Rules said:Yep! I doubt any program you can bu for Win XP would make use of it
Will Omega release custom drivers for them?
It's the same as nearly any other add-in coprocessor such as the Clearspeed programmable processors. Having a processor accessible through a driver rather than through firmware means that one can ignore silly decades-old x86 compatibility and seek optimum performance. It's the same reason why GPU manufacturers can change processor architectures every few years while CPUs have been straining to improve x86 for twenty years.
Zefan said:
Well I would suggest you dont make yourself sound stupid, infantile and infancy are two seperate words with completely different meanings.
If you dont know the correct meaning of a word I suggest you dont use it
edit - didnt mean to sound harsh or rude or anything
Last edited:
Soldato
A minute 
...Assuming that you could find a compiler that could try even remotely hard to keep all those vector units busy.
/anti-Sony troll
/anti-Sony troll