Move over Sharapova!

Associate
Joined
5 Nov 2003
Posts
290
Location
Stoke-on-Trent
mk_031.jpg


Both together!
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Jul 2004
Posts
4,517
Location
Melbourne , Oz.
Sharapova reminds me of a girl I used to live with.
Cost me 15 grand to get rid of her and the cow still pesters me , therefore by default I would have to pick the other one.
 

Sem

Sem

Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
4,602
Location
London
EasyG said:
av seen nicer women when i go to a club tbh, the onyl reason i would go with either of them is for money.

yep i agree

in my area ive seen nicer women on the street with no makeup better then them

not saying they are ugly or anything i just think they are not "that" nice

id still hit it tho :D
 
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
17,933
Location
Liverpool, UK
She's a top female tennis player, which generally means 3 things....

1) She has great legs
2) She has a great body
3) She has great stamina

Add those together with her lovely face, and the answer is certainly "I'd hit it!" :D
 
Associate
Joined
1 Sep 2004
Posts
1,647
Location
newcastle
Davey_Pitch said:
She's a top female tennis player, which generally means 3 things....

1) She has great legs
2) She has a great body
3) She has great stamina

Add those together with her lovely face, and the answer is certainly "I'd hit it!" :D

or

shes a top tennis player which means 3 things

1) she has no breasts
2) she has a dad who runs her life
3) shes on tour so u'd never see her to "hit her"
 
Caporegime
Joined
9 May 2005
Posts
31,714
Location
Cambridge
I agree MS is nothing special, because she has nice long blonde hair and a reasonable figure it gets blown right out of proportion. Kornikova facially wasnt that hot either. It s amoney and success thing, there were 5 better looking girls in my gym today.
 
Back
Top Bottom