Caporegime
Not a bad choice, not as quick or as well built, personally i would stick with the CTR, your looking at 9 - 10 for a good condition 04 plate 182 and 12 - 13k for a CTR, also consider the Honda will be worth much more come sale time.
Firestar_3x said:Not a bad choice, not as quick or as well built, personally i would stick with the CTR, your looking at 9 - 10 for a good condition 04 plate 182 and 12 - 13k for a CTR, also consider the Honda will be worth much more come sale time.
Firestar_3x said:The CTR was quicker round the 5th gear test track with Tiff driving i do belive, with so little price diff between a newer clio and a CTR its a no brainer really, if you are talking sub 7k money now thats a diff story.
Paul Spiteri said:pics
jonarob said:What's the stick like being up there?
Easier, more difficult, no different?
toy_soldier said:Whats fuel economy like on CTR's?
Trojan said:Clio 182
I wouldn't go so far as to say it's a better performing car than the CTR, but it's certainly on a par, and a lot cheaper.
Sanchez said:Very nice. Certainly suited in black (the metallic grey is nice too). I'm sure you'll have loads of fun in it!!
Firestar_3x said:We are talking same year etc, i'm not interested in comparing a 2002 Clio against a 2004 / 2005 CTR hows that fair,
Firestar_3x said:Yes its more of an initial investment but the Honda holds its value much better than the clio and come sale time you will get a good chuck of it back, so the price diff really aint that much.
James_N said:you can get a facelift model CTR for around £11.5k now, thats amazingly cheap. and pre facelift from around £7.5k. pretty dam good value