1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

New F3 Vs Old Cheetah

Discussion in 'Storage Drives' started by ubersonic, 19 Apr 2010.

  1. ubersonic

    Capodecina

    Joined: 26 May 2009

    Posts: 21,103

    Hiya I recently replaced an aging 80gb ATA100 drive in my workstation (Q9650 CPU, 4gb DDR2-1066, Nforce 7 Mobo) and I was having trouble with what to replace it with. I had a choice between using a spare 72GB 15k Cheetah U320 drive and a spare 32bit PCI Adaptec 29160 controller (limiting the drive to U160 operation and 160MB/s bandwidth) or forking out £45 for a Samsung spinpoint F3 500GB drive.

    In the end I decided to buy the F3 and benchmark both drives then if the F3 lost I would add it to my mediasart server, heres my results:
    --------------------------
    HD Tune (Spinpoint F3)

    min MB/s: 76.2
    Max MB/s: 144.2
    Avg MB/s: 119.1

    Access time: 13.3ms

    Burst speed: 159.8MB/s

    CPU usage: 4.5%
    --------------------------
    HD Tune (Cheetah)

    min MB/s: 47.5
    Max MB/s: 72.9
    Avg MB/s: 63.3

    Access time: 5.8ms

    Burst speed: 73.3 MB/s

    CPU usage: 1.9%
    --------------------------
    Crystal Diskmark (Spinpoint F3)

    Seq Read: 151.1MB/s
    Seq Write: 150.1MB/s
    512K Read: 48.55MB/s
    512K Write: 59.80MB/s
    4K Read: 0.58MB/s
    4K Write: 1.084MB/s
    4K QD32 Read: 1.146MB/s
    4K QD32 Write: 1.1MB/s
    --------------------------
    Crystal Diskmark (Cheetah)

    Seq Read: 76.32MB/s
    Seq Write: 67.33MB/s
    512K Read: 51.71MB/s
    512K Write: 42.59MB/s
    4K Read: 1.271MB/s
    4K Write: 2.389MB/s
    4K QD32 Read: 3.344MB/s
    4K QD32 Write: 2.687MB/s
    --------------------------

    Well thats pretty conclusive, being limited to the 160MB/s bandwidth of the U160 controller didnt effect the Cheetah as a single drive wasnt enough to bottleneck the bus. The F3 is very impressive, it may have been battling an 8 year old opponant but the retail price gap makes up for that. for large sustained file transfers the F3 is the man however I am more interested in the access time and the ability to read a lot of small files very fast and in this area the Cheetah manages to stay ahead so It will be the drive I use and the F3 will find a new home im my Mediasmart server where its cpacity will actually be put ot use.

    I hope my research is of use to anyone else who needs to make a similar decision (because old U320 drives on a U160 bus Vs SATA2 Juggernauts is a very common question ^^)