1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Raid 0

Discussion in 'Storage Drives' started by drak3, 15 May 2006.

  1. drak3

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 26 Jan 2006

    Posts: 1,509

    whats an appropriate stripe size for games in raid 0?
     
  2. woodsy2k

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 6 Nov 2005

    Posts: 1,547

    Umm i would say two 80GBs would do the job nicely.

    Wouldnt really want to go any bigger really as its just a waste. Unless you can see yourself filling essentiall 148GB of just games?!

    :)
     
  3. jbloggs

    Soldato

    Joined: 4 Sep 2005

    Posts: 6,961

    Location: NI

    drak3:

    I use a stripe size of 32KB, and a cluster size of 4KB, games run fine with this.

    I suppose being a bit more "specific" about it, the larger the files within the game the larger the stripe size should be, ie a 32KB stripe is a good size for small files, like Windows XP. :)
     
  4. ChrisLX200

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 23 Jun 2004

    Posts: 2,094

    Location: Macclesfield

    Yeah, it depends on your average file sizes. Some games (like FlightSim2004) use lots of smaller files and I would select a smaller stripe - like 16KB, others use big DAT files and 64KB or even 128KB might be better. If you use a big stripe the worst you'll get is the performance of 1 disk as a lot of files won't get split, use a tiny stripe (like 2KB) and you reduce performance for all files much bigger than that as it will be broken up into lots of bits.

    Personally I wouldn't use RAID anyway, but that's another question :)
     
  5. Bones

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 28 Jan 2003

    Posts: 1,167

    Location: London

    why would you not use RAID for games? i have just got another 37.5gb raptor and plan on using it in RAID 0 for a windows install and games partition.
     
  6. R@tman

    Hitman

    Joined: 21 Jul 2005

    Posts: 781

    Location: Wakefield

    i got 2 SATA 80gb maxtors in raid 0 im using 16 k stripe and im not convinced theres much performance gain over not running them in raid
     
  7. smids

    Soldato

    Joined: 18 Dec 2004

    Posts: 6,660

    Location: London/Kent

    16K really if you don't game and want a nippy windows.
    32K for a mixture of both nippy wnidows and games.
    64/128K for pure gaming speed - this is pointless though as how often do you actually utilise the HDU in games? Makes much more sense to go for 32K as this is a middle road for both.
     
  8. ChrisLX200

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 23 Jun 2004

    Posts: 2,094

    Location: Macclesfield

    I had used RAID for many years, both RAID0, 1 and 0+1. I just got fed up with it going wrong - plus (when I finally realised RAID0 was just too risky) having 2 additional drives running as mirrors is an inefficient method of keeping backup information (no compression). Can't say I miss it now I don't use RAID.