Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
6 series was 2012 wasn’t it? Or did that come out just after Crysis 2 in 2011?
6870 was 2010.
It's 14 months late, it draws a lot of power, it competes with Nvidia's 3rd tier card, there are no AIB cards 2-3 months after release and it's more expensive than people had hoped.
Just because AMD apparently set out to be disappointing doesn't mean it's not underwhelming after a 14 month wait.
Yeh but you knew what I was talking about.Showing your age there bud
Sadly I did and LMAO @ SiYeh but you knew what I was talking about.
JediFragger was telling someone in the monitor thread I was 92, silly sod
JediFragger was telling someone in the monitor thread I was 92, silly sod
This is the type of thing that makes me want to disregard anything you ever say. You've no objectivity.
V64's came out at a price point that AIB 1080 occupied, while not actually being better. That in itself is underwhelming. That's ignoring the price that puts it at higher than 1080 AIB models.
All of this after one of the most prolonged launches I've ever seen is why Vega can only ever be described as underwhelming at best.
I kind of agree with you but they had so long with it, we all expected something special and even I was hoping for a 1080Ti killer but we got a 1080 competitor and something that runs with the need for Sizewell B to power it. Hot, no custom cards as of yet and it has been out long enough for those to have appeared. Basically, it is a year+ late to the party for what it is achieving.
Raja Koduri Joins Intel as Chief Architect to Drive Unified Vision across Cores and Visual Computing
Intel to Expand Strategy to Deliver High-End, Discrete Graphics Solutions
SANTA CLARA, Calif., Nov. 8, 2017 – Intel today announced the appointment of Raja Koduri as Intel chief architect, senior vice president of the newly formed Core and Visual Computing Group, and general manager of a new initiative to drive edge computing solutions. In this position, Koduri will expand Intel’s leading position in integrated graphics for the PC market with high-end discrete graphics solutions for a broad range of computing segments.
Billions of users today enjoy computing experiences powered by Intel’s leading cores and visual computing IP. Going forward under Koduri’s leadership, the company will unify and expand differentiated IP across computing, graphics, media, imaging and machine intelligence capabilities for the client and data center segments, artificial intelligence, and emerging opportunities like edge computing.
“Raja is one of the most experienced, innovative and respected graphics and system architecture visionaries in the industry and the latest example of top technical talent to join Intel,” said Dr. Murthy Renduchintala, Intel’s chief engineering officer and group president of the Client and Internet of Things Businesses and System Architecture. “We have exciting plans to aggressively expand our computing and graphics capabilities and build on our very strong and broad differentiated IP foundation. With Raja at the helm of our Core and Visual Computing Group, we will add to our portfolio of unmatched capabilities, advance our strategy to lead in computing and graphics, and ultimately be the driving force of the data revolution.”
Koduri brings to Intel more than 25 years of experience in visual and accelerated computing advances across a broad range of platforms, including PCs, game consoles, professional workstations and consumer devices. His deep technical expertise spans graphics hardware, software and system architecture.
“I have admired Intel as a technology leader and have had fruitful collaborations with the company over the years,” Koduri said. “I am incredibly excited to join the Intel team and have the opportunity to drive a unified architecture vision across its world-leading IP portfolio that help’s accelerate the data revolution.”
Koduri, 49, joins Intel from AMD, where he most recently served as senior vice president and chief architect of the Radeon Technologies Group. In this role, he was responsible for overseeing all aspects of graphics technologies used in AMD’s APU, discrete GPU, semi-custom and GPU compute products. Prior to AMD, Koduri served as director of graphics architecture at Apple Inc., where he helped establish a leadership graphics sub-system for the Mac product family and led the transition to Retina computer displays.
Koduri will officially start in his new role at Intel in early December.
If Intel can develop better APU's with Raja's help without AMD collaborating then it doesn't seem a win for AMD. Seems the opposite.
Yup, and if people don't think secrets are shared once someone moves to a rival then they are *seriously* deluded. Bad news for AMD all round I think.
Yup, and if people don't think secrets are shared once someone moves to a rival then they are *seriously* deluded. Bad news for AMD all round I think.
nVidia look fine from where I'm sitting. Market leaders with their hands in various pies, all the way to their elbows....Exactly what Adored mentioned in his video. NVidia are about to get smacked.
Both of those can't be true.Nvidia is so profitable because of the lack of adequate competition. They make medium level cards which they sell for top-tier price-tags.
AMD bleeds money because they make top-tier cards which they sell at medium-level price-tags.
AMDThat is your choice, I have my own Opinion. My Opinion still remains am happy with Vega, AM happy with the price I paid £470... I do also have an opinion on AIB models and I think it sucks that we are still waiting! For whatever reason I have no idea.. If I was to guess it would be Price to Market was very high! Who really to blame here though? You hear so much difference from AMD being the blame to Mining to retailers.
AMD
Who else is supposed to have designed the cards?
It's the design that made it expensive, it's not the AIBs fault or we'd have the same issue with the RX 500 cards and all of Nvidia's cards.
You mean like this:
https://wccftech.com/tech-secrets-nvidia-amd-tsmc-stolen/
That is in China too,a country known to be lax for IP protection.
People are a tad deluded if they think that it works that way. I know people who work in biomedical and computing research and they had to sign agreements with industrial collaborators(some people were working with large biotech companies),which if they were broken(or suspected of having broken) would have screwed them entirely,as the lawyers would have had a field day. Also companies don't tend to like hiring people who would do that,as even Intel might think,what if the chap moved elsewhere and gave away their secrets. So your career would be screwed over too.
Plus,AMD and Nvidia have massive amounts of patents regarding graphics IP,and that is why Intel needed to license Nvidia patents for the last 5 years. If the conspiracy theory was true that people leak stuff willy nilly,instead of over a billion dollars in licensing agreements,it would be far cheaper to poach a few Nvidia engineers.
This only means one thing,Intel will be licensing AMD tech or even probably will be looking to buy aspects of it.