***The Official OcUK Lego Thread***

Soldato
Joined
9 Mar 2003
Posts
14,236
I wouldn't care at all if they were not just straight up ripping off Lego products and other peoples IP without any care in the world.

They wouldn't sell anything if they had to make their own stuff.

As much as people shout about it on here the market for retired sets is niche at best. A company like Lego couldn't sustain every set indefinitely. They only retire sets once sales drop off. Same thing applies for action figures, comics etc.
 
Caporegime
Joined
13 Jan 2010
Posts
32,572
Location
Llaneirwg
I can understand if all you buy is current lego sets from lepin. But of (like many of us) you buy most current sets from lego and retired sets from lepin what' t issue?

No way I'm paying 100's for a retird s just because I wasn't into it back then.
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Jun 2005
Posts
20,772
Location
Southampton
I think it's absolutely OK in certain circumstances.

By all means head over to ebay/BL and buy a discontinued set for 5x it's initial value from someone who bought every copy they could find in order to fleece clever boys like you.

I don't pay over inflated prices for sets I can't afford I just accept I can't have them. Because having a lepin set does not do it for me.

I still don't have the set I just have a dodgy lookalike
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Nov 2002
Posts
9,791
Location
London UK
Jimlad said:
"I just have a dodgy lookalike
And therein lies the rub, the quality if Lepin has improved significantly where it is no longer a dodgy lookalike and they are rolling out new MOC sets all the time. Yes I agree it takes the **** selling copies of official lego kits before they have been launched or MOC models with no royalties going to the designers but if they can change their operating model they could put some serious competition into the market.

Xingbao which I believe is part of Lepin is taking MOC sets and getting approval from the designers to release them (unsure if they get payment or not). This means more interesting and complex sets at a decent price.
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Jun 2005
Posts
20,772
Location
Southampton
I am all for that. For example Lego don't do full on military / army sets. Why don't lepin do that. It's the knock off stuff I have an issue with. As ultimately it ends up mixed in with the genuine stuff and for me that is just aids
 
Associate
Joined
25 Oct 2002
Posts
2,299
Location
Sarf Lahndahn
A company like Lego couldn't sustain every set indefinitely.

Personally I don't believe that. Lego's logistics are entirely automated and there aren't a ridiculous number of parts. They could easily offer unboxed parts kits for retired sets at the very least. The copy manufacturers maintain a far wider product range with (presumably) far less infrastructure.

I can go on Bricklink, download the instructions for any historical set and purchase the parts inventory via a third party seller network. And that's a community designed system. Lego could do it in a heartbeat if they wanted to. They don't want to because they're happy being seen as the premium brand with a desirable back catalogue. It keeps their market buoyant, their perceived value- and consequently their retail prices- high.

I doubt the impact from the Chinese copy brands would even be registering on the balance sheet, because they're almost unknown to the general masses, you don't see them on store shelves outside of Hong Kong, and they don't market themselves.

Happy to take this convo elsewhere if it's annoying the majority...
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Mar 2003
Posts
14,236
Personally I don't believe that. Lego's logistics are entirely automated and there aren't a ridiculous number of parts. They could easily offer unboxed parts kits for retired sets at the very least. The copy manufacturers maintain a far wider product range with (presumably) far less infrastructure.
I can't really see how that will work, its far more complex than you make out. The sets are produced in batches because they sell millions of them. They only make the parts they need to make those batches. Sure some common parts will be constantly in production like Technic pins. But most of the sets you are referring to are UCS sets which do have unique parts, printed parts, have parts in a colour specific to that set and sell in relatively low volumes. It would be extremely expensive to have sets on demand, the sheer number of parts is insane once you take into account the colours used. Where do you draw the line, there are thousands of retired sets now. Lets not forget the retail model they have to support also.

The difference is with brick link is parts are spread around the world in peoples basements which have zero overhead. No one carry's all the parts you want, you have to deal with multiple sellers and get shipments from all over the place. There are also things like stickers and instructions and retail packaging to deal with.
 
Caporegime
Joined
9 May 2005
Posts
31,714
Location
Cambridge
How about some official lego to dry the tears and stop us worrying about Lego profits. Ran into some bargains today to go with the sets obtained at Christmas. We also broke up 100ish kits to make room for the new, all sorted into colours for my son to build whatever he likes.


sy0yg8.jpg
 
Associate
Joined
23 Sep 2006
Posts
2,399
Location
Wiltshire
I’ve finally finished my Christmas present, a really fun build with a lot of playable features and it’s quite big (3400 parts). There’s a fair few technic parts, as there’s two working cranes, the rear tracks can be steered and the front ramp can be raised and lowered. And loads of mini figures, I highly recommend it.



 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
13 Jan 2010
Posts
32,572
Location
Llaneirwg
Shame the space shuttle didn't make it past ideas board.
The next lot look garbage imo.

In other news I'm only 300 instructions through the ucs falcon and it's already heavy!
 
Back
Top Bottom