lordedmond said:
FatRakoon
i think you could activate both with a retail copy , how would MS know that you had not uninstalled the first copy?
MS will Know.
With the XP Cracks, even the ones that work fully, and allow full updates etc, there was no checking of the source other than to know what is needed for your PC to gte the right updates.
With Vista its different as it will be sending all information such as what updates that PC has already had in the past, your licence will also be sent over, and MS will be ( on the nice side if things ) working out why it had this update and that update in order to improve things in future, but, it will also verify your licence with every other licence that has already been used, so as with XP, you can still use one serial licence number and crack as many copies as you like and still have full updates etc, this cannot happen with Vista, as MS themselves check it out.
So, when you do anything with the licence of Vista, MS will see that the licence is being used for both 32 and 64 bit versions and will disable your PC for you ( Another one of MS lovely little tricks ) until you can prove that you are only using one PC... After all, its very possible for you to have 2 identical PCs one with Vista 32 and one with Vista64 isnt it?
I mean, when I knocked up a couple of PCs for my 2 boys, I gave them identical bits ( Stops *** arguements as much as anything ) and in a few experiments I copied the WPA files over and it went on just fine and was happy that it had been activated, even though it was not.
So, no, it is my understanding that you iwl not be able to get away with it anymore, purely because when you do anything like updates etc ( Even the automatic ones ) then your PC details are all sent to MS