** The Official Space Flight Thread - The Space Station and Beyond **

Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
16,303
Location
Manchester
So in 2023 when they send the first totally automated crew (and untrained to fly) up to the ISS in Crew Dragon, the "passengers" wont be astronauts?

Are they paying passengers/tourists? Then no, like Dennis Tito. If they can fix, conduct experiments, fly manually or otherwise be included in decisions, like repairing systems etc. that require extensive training/education then they are indeed astronauts :)

They would be something like astro tourists, or whatever name they eventually come up with.

Just like if in 100 years I could drive to an air & space port, hop on a spaceship and take a trip to the moon like I can take a flight to spain, I would be no more an astronaut then than I would be a pilot now.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
16,303
Location
Manchester
There's not much about those missions that wasn't ballsy, even by spaceflight standards.

Agreed, and to make it even more confusing apparently one of the criteria for it to be a spaceflight was to land with the spacecraft, because Gagarin parachuted down separate to the spacecraft, technically whatever international body that recognises spaceflight might have rejected it as an official flight.
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Feb 2006
Posts
5,724
Location
--->
But that's exactly what going back to the moon is preparing for - a permanent moon base, building habitats autonomously etc.

It not a case anymore of "lets do a. Right, now that's done, what shall we do for b?" Not looking beyond the next big this is precisely what has stifled space exploration so far. We're now doing a then b then c then d to ultimately end up at e.

Well, for me (re)putting a man on the moon is 'part a' - let's consider moon bases, teleporters, warp-drives and worm-holes after we've done that.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2011
Posts
21,592
Location
ST4
Also, let's not forget that once we have a base on the moon that is capable of manufacturing fuel and launching ships, ones that aren't gimped by having to punch through Earth's atmosphere and gravity well, the asteroids are well within prospecting/mining distance. And once we start the mining > refining > production cycle that utilises those raw materials the solar system gets a lot smaller.
 
Caporegime
Joined
22 Oct 2002
Posts
26,953
Location
Boston, Lincolnshire
Also, let's not forget that once we have a base on the moon that is capable of manufacturing fuel and launching ships, ones that aren't gimped by having to punch through Earth's atmosphere and gravity well, the asteroids are well within prospecting/mining distance. And once we start the mining > refining > production cycle that utilises those raw materials the solar system gets a lot smaller.

Don't start mining or we are going to have to call Isaac Clarke to sort everything out.
 

SPG

SPG

Soldato
Joined
28 Jul 2010
Posts
10,259
Also, let's not forget that once we have a base on the moon that is capable of manufacturing fuel and launching ships, ones that aren't gimped by having to punch through Earth's atmosphere and gravity well, the asteroids are well within prospecting/mining distance. And once we start the mining > refining > production cycle that utilises those raw materials the solar system gets a lot smaller.

Not in my lifetime, maybe in the next 150 years.
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Jun 2005
Posts
3,066
Location
The South
...then Al Shepard and Gus Grissom weren't astronauts until their respective second flights since their first Mercury missions were suborbital lobs just like this one.

Albeit there was, and still is with your typical Astronaut, vastly more training involved than what is given to New Shepard customers; i imagine even less on Virgin Galaxy. Plus Shepard's and Grissom's flights where another 80KM higher - not that it matters.

The definition will probably have to change when consumer spaceflight becomes normal...

Yup as there is a massive difference between customers going up in New Shepard/Virgin Galaxy and trained Astronauts for orbit missions.
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
22 Nov 2005
Posts
45,278
That was boring to watch :(
what do you want some giant boobed lass in a bikini so we can observe the effects as they enter free fall?

In reality a rocket is basically a lift that goes up and comes back down, just without the cables, it's basically a theme park ride like when you experience negative gravity on a roller coaster, you could probably get the same experience with a lift, it just has to fall at the same speed as a humans terminal velocity ?

there should be a time limit before you become an astronaut , or unless you have done a space walk then your not actually an astronaut , something like that.

to me it's like dipping your feet into the ocean and claiming you were an aqua-naut/scubadiver whatever,

they penetrated space for such a brief moment
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
17 Jul 2007
Posts
24,529
Location
Solihull-Florida
what do you want some giant boobed lass in a bikini so we can observe the effects as they enter free fall?

In reality a rocket is basically a lift that goes up and comes back down, just without the cables, it's basically a theme park ride like when you experience negative gravity on a roller coaster, you could probably get the same experience with a lift, it just has to fall at the same speed as a humans terminal velocity ?

there should be a time limit before you become an astronaut , or unless you have done a space walk then your not actually an astronaut , something like that.

to me it's like dipping your feet into the ocean and claiming you were an aqua-naut/scubadiver whatever,

they penetrated space for such a brief moment


We all have our own opinion.
I watched the moon landing LIVE.
Nothing has come close to that yet.


Now hat was epic!
 
Back
Top Bottom