Man of Honour
Firestar_3x said:Back looks alright
Firestar_3x said:Back looks alright
Im not going by performance hereFirestar_3x said:But 0-60 in 3.9 just about 200mph in 1983, it was amazing!
Back looks alright old 911 lights front looks better!
Gilly said:
Clarkey said:the scoob is pretty ugly, they sold purely on the performance.
spaz said:
Reminds me of Johnny Number 5, looks good too.
GSXRMovistar said:One more car, whilst it does look like an old car it's looks without doubt are timeless, the Cobra.
Zip said:Minis a pretty timeless.
The bug is the least timeless car around so your wrong baout the mini[TW]Fox said:No it isnt, the Mini is irrefutably a 1960's car. It's the least timeless car ever
Smiley Man said:i am going to be VERY biased here so dont shoot me but the 206 is fairly timeless, seeing as its now 8 or so years old and still doesnt look out of place next to other brand new superminis
[TW]Fox said:8 years is far too new to be saying that, there are numerous 8 year old cars which, whilst they hardly look old now, are far from timeless. In another 8 years the 206 will look old.
[TW]Fox said:A quick straw poll - is there ANYONE here who, when given a choice of one of three cars completely free would chose the Honda:
a) 1997 Honda NSX 3.0
b) 1997 Ferrari F355
c) 1997 Porsche 911
Wikipedia said:On July 20, 2005, a mere several days after the announcement of the closure of current NSX production, Honda CEO Takeo Fukui announced that a new NSX was under development and would sport a Formula 1-inspired V10 motor, with speculation that it might have the SH-AWD (Super Handling All Wheel Drive) system from the Acura RL. In addition, he stated it would be ready within three to four years.