Top 5 hot hatches of all time?

Soldato
Joined
8 Mar 2003
Posts
2,857
Location
Washington
Mr_Sukebe said:
Maybe he's refering to the LHD only 16v version? I bet that it would have been somewhat interesting.

I*think* I remember hearing that the braking setup on the RHD versions was woeful due to the system needed to actuate the master cylinder. It was essentially on the other side of the car to the pedal and in the engine bay, you lost a lot of feel.

I may be imagining that, though.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2003
Posts
13,608
Location
Back with a Vengeance.
Mad old tory said:
Darkside/Lopez why specify the LHD golf mk1?
because the car was first and foremost designed to be in LHD format with RHD versions an afterthought....after all the RHD market for a car like that isn't exactly large.converting to RHD involved a lot of linkage to the master cylinder etc that remained on the n/s of the car and every joint on each piece of linkage of course had some "play" in it.add them all up and the pedal felt like it was connected to a blancmange.
they never really got it (the brakes) right with the mk1 IMHO and it really spoiled the car.
as much as it annoys me, the LHD is definitely the better version.
Shootist said:
Ok, thanks for that.
easy tiger, only messing with you.
 
Man of Honour
Man of Honour
Joined
23 Dec 2002
Posts
10,003
Location
London
Should we add the R5GTT to the LHD is best option.
I read that the 2nd generation GTT ended up with the fuel line going somewhere near the turbo due to the RHD conversion, sometimes resulting in fuel vapourisation at high speeds. Nothing like getting engine cut out at an indicated 130mph.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2003
Posts
13,608
Location
Back with a Vengeance.
malc30 said:
Which is why the Lancia Delta Integrale is left hand drive only aswell. ;)
the Golf wasn't LHD only though :confused: .
anyhoo i personally don't think that's the reason.more to do with the car being a homologation special and they knew they'd sell them all on the continent thus avoiding spending the HUGE costs involved to convert to RHD.
look at the Fiat Barchetta, they knew the market her for such a car was small so decided not to bother (read waste) the money developing RHD even though it's a great little car.

as for the Integrale i just don't see the attraction.it's an attractively aggresive car and it's a good performer on the road...but i'd take an Escort Cosworth over one every time.i drove an Integrale on a gravel stage and hated it.it's not easy to drive hard, i felt every stone on the damn road and i finished on one cylinder less than i'd started with.
i believe that a car should be relatively easy to drive whereas with the ntegrale driving it hard is actually hard work and as far as i'm concerned that means not pleasureable.
 
Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2003
Posts
13,608
Location
Back with a Vengeance.
Mr_Sukebe said:
Should we add the R5GTT to the LHD is best option.
I read that the 2nd generation GTT ended up with the fuel line going somewhere near the turbo due to the RHD conversion, sometimes resulting in fuel vapourisation at high speeds. Nothing like getting engine cut out at an indicated 130mph.
there's a nice design fault on the Escort RST.
an ECU trigger wire runs really close to the turbo heatshield.over time the engine vibrations make the shield chafe away at the wire until one day you're driving along and metal heatshield touches metal wire, the ECU hiccups and the car stops dead.of course as soon as the engine stops running the metal to metal contact also ceases allowing the engine to start again for a random period of time until it happens again.
i've known garages charge owners lots of money to fix this problem when in reality all they do is re-route the wire in question.
 
Associate
Joined
5 Nov 2003
Posts
293
Location
UK
Stonedofmoo said:
The Pulsar GTi-R was the lightest of all the period roadgoing rally cars. In fact at 1200kg or less depending on what model you went for, it's pretty damn light by any standard.
This was reflected in the fact that it was quicker at accelerating than all those cars of the time including the Escort Cosworth

It also gets my vote
1220kg, unless it’s the rare Dakar version. Yes, light for a 4WD rally type, but we’re talking hot hatches, and relative to my ideal for a hot hatch. Having owned both GTi-R and Sunny GTi, the extra 120kg of the R makes a significant difference, making it feel more like a mid-weight car, which is getting away a smidge from the nippy, effortlessly chuckable handling, which for me defines a hot hatch. Just my preference ;)
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
16 Dec 2003
Posts
1,586
Location
Halifax , UK
1. Lancia Delta Integrale - Can't see how people can say bad comments about this car, one of the fastest point to point cars ever, Extremely quick round corners, great aggressive lines. Would show an Escort Cossie a thing or two down a back road as well as 95% of other cars.

2. Peugeot 306 GTI-6/Rallye/S16 - Excellent cars, been out in a few GTI-6's and an S16 and they are excellent!

3. Peugeot 205 GTI

4. Renault Clip 172/182

5. Pulsar GTI-R
 
Associate
Joined
29 Jun 2004
Posts
2,260
Location
Rainham, Kent
1 - Golf GTI mk 1
2 - Golf GTI 16v mk2 (I had one of these, great car)
3 - Peugeot 205 gti 1.9
4 - Astra GTE 16V (notorious in its day for being the twocers car of choice)
5 - Renault Clio 172/182
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Oct 2002
Posts
9,607
Location
Manchester City Centre
I'm a bit suprised that the VTS is there and not the 106 GTi. It's generally considered to be "better" despite being near enough identical. The 106 has different suspension setup and also some differing components. (Lets not start an argument though, some people just won't believe this so it's pointless).

Only reason I can think is the price thing, but then 106 GTi's aren't exactly expensive. And when new they were pretty much the same weren't they?
 

Sam

Sam

Soldato
Joined
12 Jan 2003
Posts
14,488
Location
Surrey
1 - Racing Puma - owns u all dont complain :p

2 - Civic Type R

3 - Peugeot 205 gti 1.9

4 - Clio 172 Cup

5 - Ford Fiesta Zetec S
 
Back
Top Bottom