Associate
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2006
- Posts
- 483
Does anyone know if you are allowed to use an image which is similar to an emoji but not exactly the same in print packaging?
Emoji's are defined in Unicode, e.g., unicode U+1F923 = a rolling on the floor laughing emoji, you're free to design your own emoji using that description and use it wherever you want I guess but if you try and use Apple's drawing of it they're not going to be best pleased as I imagine they wouldn't license it to you without paying a fortune. http://www.unicode.org/emoji/charts/full-emoji-list.html
The Twitter emoji's (https://github.com/twitter/twemoji) are licensed under creative commons 4, you're free to use them as long as you provide an attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
The Google emoji's (https://www.google.com/get/noto/help/emoji/ and https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-emoji/) are licensed under the SIL Open Font License license which looks to allow commercial use without atribution (http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?item_id=OFL).
Enjoy
Every day's a school day, I genuinely thought that the big dawgs would've found a way to copyright them!
They can but I think they just choose to release them for free.. I guess it's good for them if people see familiar looking emoji's over the web and subtly think of twitter or whatever.
Microsoft, Google, Facebook and Twitter open-source tonnes and tonnes of useful stuff
Does anyone know if you are allowed to use an image which is similar to an emoji but not exactly the same in print packaging?