1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Poll: War - yes/no?

Discussion in 'GD Archive' started by [TW]Fox, 18 Mar 2003.

?

Do you think there should be war on Iraq

  1. Yes

    275 vote(s)
    68.9%
  2. No

    124 vote(s)
    31.1%
  1. [TW]Fox

    Man of Honour

    Joined: 17 Oct 2002

    Posts: 155,909

    Can we have a war poll?

    Hey Dons,

    Now this is about to start, would it be possible to have a poll to find out what percentage of the forum members are behind Bush and Blairs decision to go in?

    Just a simple yes or no poll :)

    Thank you :)
     
  2. Werewolf

    Commissario

    Joined: 17 Oct 2002

    Posts: 28,603

    Location: Panting like a fiend

    polling booth

    n/t
     
  3. Robert

    Capodecina

    Joined: 20 Oct 2002

    Posts: 15,001

    Location: North West

    yes i am sick of all these anti-war guys , it is their opinions but some are just unfounded :(;)
     
  4. Cemetery

    Soldato

    Joined: 17 Oct 2002

    Posts: 5,900

    Done
     
  5. [TW]Fox

    Man of Honour

    Joined: 17 Oct 2002

    Posts: 155,909

    Thanks :)
     
  6. rare

    Soldato

    Joined: 1 Nov 2002

    Posts: 6,811

    Total: 5 votes 100%

    Lets see how long it stays like that:D
     
  7. Lopéz

    Man of Honour

    Joined: 17 Oct 2002

    Posts: 27,532

    Location: Leicestershire

    Voted.

    Getting bored with all the so-called protests personally.
    Now where did I put my hippy-slaying machine gun?

    (That was a JOKE for all the hypersensitive bearded female protestors out there)
     
  8. Evil_Homer

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 19 Oct 2002

    Posts: 1,716

    Location: Surrey Uni

    Well I dont really agree with it so I'd like to say no, but I believe its going to happen sooner or later somewhere in the world so I think we might as well get it out of the way and stop trying to prevent something that is almost certain to happen anyways (Sooner or later at least).

    TBH Id rather just see Bush and Sadam in a boxing ring and fighting it out man-2-man. That way you're not putting the rest of the world at risk, just the people at the centre of it.
     
  9. Chief Wiggum

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 23 Dec 2002

    Posts: 1,495

    Location: Under my desk

    I've voted:
    No - this is just for the mo, a war should not happen without full UN backing.
     
  10. bandit

    Mobster

    Joined: 6 Nov 2002

    Posts: 4,277

    Location: Brum, Brum, Brum, Brum....

    i voted no.

    no un resolution, no mandate, no proof, no international backing.....disarmament working (albeit slowly), no need for innocents to die...double standards
     
  11. Robert

    Capodecina

    Joined: 20 Oct 2002

    Posts: 15,001

    Location: North West


    would you want saddam to bomb somewere or even release noxious gases to prove your ****** point ?
     
  12. rare

    Soldato

    Joined: 1 Nov 2002

    Posts: 6,811

    Theres always going to be double standards, always has been.

    That does not mean Saddam is any less or more guilty.
     
  13. vitet

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 5 Nov 2002

    Posts: 1,308

    Location: Cambridge

    I do back the decision to go into Iraq now. Clearly Saddam isn't intending to leave.
     
  14. Simian

    Sgarrista

    Joined: 19 Oct 2002

    Posts: 8,117

    Location: Swindoniantown

    I voted Yes!... We sholdn't stand by and watch another Hitler re-immerge from the woodwork!... Specially not one who we know (illegidly) has: Chemical Weapons, Dirty Bombs, and a few of those Nowty Missiles tucked away under his bed!.

    But!!!... and this is a big BUT I wish both My Sister and Brother-in-Law didn't have to go out there!.. :( I don't wanna loose either of em too Hostile or Friendly Fire!...

    We should Draft all those Hippy's and Lay-Abouts on the Dole give em a few weeks Basic, Promise em a Steady Wage (better than the Dole! - Just!...:D ) and send em in as Cannon Fodder!... ;) Sorry s'just my (twisted) h'opinion!.. :p
     
  15. bandit

    Mobster

    Joined: 6 Nov 2002

    Posts: 4,277

    Location: Brum, Brum, Brum, Brum....

    no reason to resort to swearing, or even *'s

    the only bombing and noxious gases are coming from the US and Blair.

    SAddam is no threat, he is less of a threat now then he was in 1991, and we slaughtered them them.

    he would never dare to release chem/bio weapons, he knows what would happen. if there was a time he would do it it woudl ahve been in 1991, but if we corner him like a rat, he might just decide to use them...if he even has them.

    and don;t bother tellingme he has them, there's no proof, just lkike the arguements the US used about the fissile material that the un inspectors rubbished as the docuemnts the us were using were forged...
     
  16. Glass

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 1,034

    Location: Aberdeenshire

    i say no to war, simply because people are going to die.
     
  17. vitet

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 5 Nov 2002

    Posts: 1,308

    Location: Cambridge

    The Iraqi people are dying already and have been ever since Saddam has been in power and they will continue doing so unless someone puts a stop to it.
     
  18. rare

    Soldato

    Joined: 1 Nov 2002

    Posts: 6,811

    The general public will benifit greatly from a UN created government, compared to what they are under now.

    For me thats reason enough to go to war.

    The fact that he has been playing the UN for 12 years is another.
     
  19. Manlove is my forte

    Sgarrista

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 9,637

    Location: Xbox Live

    so no one is dieing in iraq right now?:confused:
     
  20. Glass

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 1,034

    Location: Aberdeenshire

    people are going to die, i don't care too much about the iraqi people, i doubt most people do. Though i know oil is of great importance, people are going to die, lots of people.